Search for: "Does 1-95" Results 161 - 180 of 3,670
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2012, 9:46 pm by Michael Geist
(2) A person who preserves data or provides a document in those circumstances does not incur any criminal or civil liability for doing so. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 6:03 pm by Bill Marler
Produce washing will decrease but not eliminate the parasite (1). [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 6:57 am
This exclusion does not prevent patenting of inventions merely because their commercial exploitation would be illegal (Section 1(4), EPC Article 53(a)). [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 8:12 am
The question was what exactly did that reference to Article 13(1) of Directive 95/46 mean. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 1:14 pm
Hire a Yale Clerk,” which notes: “Using a sample of 12,966 opinions written by 95 federal district court judges, the portion of a judge’s non-permanent clerks from Yale Law School is found to be positively related to the likelihood the opinion will have a negative (warning) or questioned signal, which is statistically significant at the 1% level. [read post]
29 May 2023, 6:17 am by Jim Walker
You should also ask the cruise line for an answer to the simple yes or no questions: (1) does the balcony have a sprinkler valve, and (2) does the balcony have a smoke/heat alarm? [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 8:06 pm by Larry
The amendment added Note 1(v) to Chapter 95, which excludes from Chapter 95 "Tableware, kitchenware, toilet articles, carpets and other textile floor coverings, apparel, bed linen, table linen, toilet linen, kitchen linen and similar articles having a utilitarian function (classified according to their constituent material). [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:06 pm
There does not seem to be any reason why they should be presumed, Art 5(1)(a) does not require a trade mark with a reputation. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 6:00 am by Steven Peck
The length of the admission to a psychiatric hospital does not seem to play a major role in skin diseases. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d at 326; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 88; Robertson v Wells, 95 AD3d 862, 863; Magnus v Sklover, 95 AD3d 837, 837). [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In vain:*** Translation of the German original ***[1.1] The [opponent] contests that Siemens AG is entitled to file an appeal.[1.2] As a consequence of the entry of the merger into the register of the seat of the receiving legal entity (übernehmender Rechtsträger) – in the present case, Siemens AG having its seat in Munich – the Flender AG does not exist any more as a legal person and its assets including the patent rights have been transferred to Siemens AG (§… [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 2:34 am by Shawn Barnett (ZA)
The FSCA declined the application on the basis that it did not comply with section 95(1)(b) of CISCA. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:00 am by Paula Bremner
Although the case dealt with Abbott’s patent, in fact Abbott does not have an applicable product approved in the US or Canada. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by Dori Molozanov
They say that the price of Sovaldi and Harvoni does not accurately reflect Gilead’s costs, and the company should be held accountable for needlessly restricting access. [read post]
6 May 2010, 8:00 am by Jerry Sisk
For injuries occurring after 10/1/95 temporary total disability benefits shall cease if the employer refuses an offer of work that is consistent with the rehabilitation plan. [read post]
24 May 2015, 3:22 pm
The criminal defendant, Phillip Johnson, is charged with Endangering the Welfare of a Child, Penal Law ["PL"] 260.10(1). [read post]