Search for: "Does 3-100, inclusive" Results 161 - 180 of 707
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2020, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
School Dist. v Clark, Clark, Millis & Gilson, 294 AD2d 93, 99 [2002], affd 100 NY2d 202 [2003]). [read post]
These include: (1) the removal of the number of family members in college from the eligibility calculation, (2) the possibility for an SAI to be a negative number, and (3) the inclusion of the adjusted value of family farms and small businesses. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 6:14 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  Instead, he argued that Spokeo’s alleged FCRA violation was “willful” and therefore he sought statutory damages of between $100 and $1,000. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 7:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Although RCP can’t occur in 100% water pressurized pipe, the inclusion of a small amount of air in a pipe could enable RCP failure. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 7:01 am by MBettman
While the FSLA exemptions include outside salespersons, the Section 34a exemptions do not, which indicates inclusion of such persons. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 9:34 am
If you miss the morning coffee you can still collect the 3 CPD Points which are on offer -- and the cost, even including the eat-all-you-can-manage buffet lunch -- is a thoroughly modest £70.00 per person (inclusive of VAT). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 10:16 am by Rob Robinson
While ComplexDiscovery regularly highlights this information, it does not assume any responsibility for content assertions. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 10:14 am by Venkat
Given that this is a criminal statute, the court is reluctant to construe it in a way that creates liability where the language is not 100% clear. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
 This was upheld by the Court of Appeal.Brian Cordery reminded the audience of the general principles relating to amendments set out in Henderson v Henderson (1843) 3 Hare 100 and Johnson v Gore Wood [2000] UKHL 65 which prevent re-litigation in circumstances not amounting to strict res judicata. [read post]
30 May 2023, 10:51 am by Rob Robinson
While ComplexDiscovery regularly highlights this information, it does not assume any responsibility for content assertions. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 3:18 pm by AALRR
"  Price contended Starbucks' use of the words "'amount paid' following gross pay and deductions does not comply with the requirement to show 'net wages.'"  Mr. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:01 am
Narcotics: cocaine, heroin, opium, morphine, oxycodone 3. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:38 am by Rob Robinson
While ComplexDiscovery regularly highlights this information, it does not assume any responsibility for content assertions. [read post]