Search for: "Downloader 88"
Results 161 - 180
of 388
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2013, 8:57 am
Appx. 782 (11th Cir.2006).9See also Antenor, 88 F.3d 925 (applying the economic realities test in resolving a joint employer issue under the FLSA). [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
This decision on a revocation appeal contains (among other things) an interesting discussion of apportionment of costs.[45] A 104(1) provides that:“Each party to the opposition proceedings shall bear the costs it has incurred, unless the Opposition Division (OD), for reasons of equity, orders, in accordance with the Implementing Regulations, a different apportionment of costs. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
Here is another decision of the Legal Board concerning a decision of the Receiving Section (RS) not to treat an application as a divisional application. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
This practice was established by DG 2 Staff Notice 1/88-III dated 22 February 1988. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
However, neither the patent application as originally filed nor the patent appears to disclose any method for the production of the claimed plants and plants parts which does not include steps of crossing and selection. [18] In view of the principle of absolute product protection (see decision G 2/88 [5]), a claim to a product provides the patent proprietor with protection that generally encompasses the protection provided by a patent claim for the process of making the product (see… [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
The decisions invoked by the patent proprietor all concern the situation where the content of the disclosure was to be assessed on the basis of the figures only, which is not the case here.[1.4] As D3 discloses all the features of claim 1, the subject-matter of this claim is not novel (A 54).Should you wish to download the whole decision (in German), just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
[…][2.4] Claim 1 is, therefore, novel.Should you wish to download the whole decision (in German), just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 3:00 am
2(c), 69, 71, 78(2), 88, 89, 90; Environmental Protection Act, S.N.L. 2002, c. [read post]
31 May 2013, 4:40 am
Pena, supra, at ¶ 88. [read post]
29 May 2013, 2:27 am
Download the financial statements Nova Group’s directors wouldn’t make public. [read post]
26 May 2013, 5:01 pm
In this appeal against the rejection of the opposition sufficiency of disclosure was the dominating issue.Main request (claims as granted)[2.1] Claim 1 refers to a pulverised water-absorbent resin powder which is characterised inter alia by having:a bulk density of not lower than 0.74 g/ml;an average particle diameter of 150 to 600 μm;a content of fine powders not higher than 10 wt%; anda water absorption capacity of not lower than 23 g/g […].[2.1.1] According to the opposed patent, such a… [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:01 pm
[…]The appeal is dismissed.Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
In point [8.3] of the reasons the EBA considered an issue that had been raised in decision T 73/88 which, in order to assess whether a claim in a later European patent application was in respect of the same invention as the priority application pursuant to A 87(1), made a distinction between technical features which are related to the function and effect of the invention and technical features which are not. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
., A 107, marginal number 29).[1.2.5] The decisions G 4/88 and G 2/04 have made decisive statements on the conditions for a change of opponent or appellant in analogy to R 22 and R 85. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
Can a loss of priority lead to a violation of A 123(2)? [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 7:07 am
According to CNN, Americans ages 18-29 send and receive an average of nearly 88 text messages per day. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 12:01 pm
Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 10:14 pm
Heck, even my 88-year old grandmother sent me a link to this one. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
National laws of the Contracting States in relation to the infringement or, for example, the question whether the financial value of a railway vehicle is greater than that of a braking control system, need not to be taken into account in this respect (See G 2/88 [3.3]). [5.2] Considering the question of the protection conferred by a claim directed to a physical entity, it is a general principle established by the jurisprudence of the Boards of Appeal that a patent which claims a physical… [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 4:09 am
” To see more findings of SHL’s Global Assessment Trends Report 2013 or and download your free copy, visit: http://www.shl.com/us/forms/content/gatr. [read post]
