Search for: "Downloader 91"
Results 161 - 180
of 424
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2014, 1:54 pm
That’s just 75 days for the season – on par with last year’s tax season but a far cry from the whopping 102 days we saw in 2012 (the season for e-filing was open for 91 days). [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 2:41 am
(You can download the supplemental data on right side of this CBO page; the files unfortunately include only one year of Obama data, not enough to analyze here). [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 10:39 pm
The iPhone is used in 97% of the Fortune 500 and 91% of the Global 500, and iPad is used in 98% of the Fortune 500 and 93% of the Global 500. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 5:01 pm
Even if the above mentioned case law would establish the principles attributed to it by the [opponent], the present alleged public prior use would prima facie not fulfil them.The evidence related to the alleged public prior use is therefore not admitted in the appeal proceedings.A witness hearing on this matter is thus also not necessary.Should you wish to download the whole decision, click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
There are several decisions in which a relatively lenient position was adopted towards the appellants, in the sense that the appeals were deemed to be admissible if the competent board was able to infer from the particulars of the case the presumed intentions of the appellant and the probable reasons underlying its actions, see in particular decisions T 162/97 [1.1.2]; T 574/91[1.2]; T 729/90 [1.2]; T 563/91 [1.2].In an even broader interpretation, it was held that an appeal was… [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
According to R 55(c) EPC 1973 the notice of opposition has to contain: (a) a statement of the extent to which the European patent is opposed, and (b) of the grounds of which the opposition is based, as well as (c) an indication of the facts and evidence (Tatsachen und Beweismittel) presented in support of these grounds.If the opposition does not meet these requirements, it has to be rejected as inadmissible pursuant to R 56(1) EPC 1973, regardless of the stage of the proceedings (T 289/91).… [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
As a consequence, the Board does not agree with the conclusions of the ED regarding the formulation of the technical problem and thus allows the definition given under point [2.3] above.The Board finally issued an order to grant a patent.Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
This opposition appeal contains quite a lot of interesting material. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
Thus, no further clarification was required by the OD.Should you wish to download the whole decision, click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
” (my emphasis)Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
Conversely, there is no adverse effect when the decision is consistent with what the party in question has requested (T 506/91 [2.8]). [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
The case law cited by the applicant is not applicable, accordinglyShould you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
A mixer (100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600) for producing a paste by mixing components, comprising a housing (110, 210, 310, 410, 510, 610) having a longitudinal axis, a rear end (111, 211, 311, 411, 511) and a front end (112, 212, 312, 412, 512) provided with a discharge opening (113, 213, 313, 413, 513); and a mixing chamber (120, 220, 320, 420, 520) formed in said housing and having an entry side (121) facing said rear end of said housing; characterized in that said mixer is adapted such that the… [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 4:55 am
It's a program that was downloaded to this computer when it was purchased. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Thus this trademark has no clear-cut meaning, nor does the subject-matter of claim 1.[3.4] The Board is not persuaded by the submissions of the appellant in favour of the clarity of claim 1, for the following reasons:[3.4.1] The appellant referred to decision T 623/91 in which a composition referring to a trademark was excluded by means of a disclaimer without infringing A 84.However, in the case underlying the cited decision [the patent proprietor] had provided evidence (see point [2.1] of… [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 10:05 pm
You can download this year's report in PDF format here. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
If you are interested in how G 1/99 (defining exceptions to the principle prohibiting reformatio in peius) is to be applied, you might want to have a look at point [2.2] et seq. of the reasons (and in particular point [2.3.2]).Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 8:11 am
And, not surprisingly, since solo attorneys use mobile devices the most, they also download the most apps, with 43 percent reporting that they downloaded apps in 2013, up from 30 percent in 2012. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
For the sake of efficient proceedings and with the approval of the parties the Board has decided to decide itself on this ground within the framework of its powers under A 111(1).As you might have guessed, the requests were found not to comply with A 100(c) / A 123(2) and the appeal was dismissed.Should you wish to download the whole decision (in German), just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Thus the [opponent’s] request for a reimbursement of the appeal fee must be refused.Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
