Search for: "Downloader 94" Results 161 - 180 of 392
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
(i) This is precisely what happened in T 951/92 cited by the petitioner: the Board found that the ED had not acted in compliance with A 96 and A 97, R 51(3) EPC 1973 (A 94(3); R 71(2) EPC 2000), which require that any communication under A 94(3) EPC shall contain a reasoned statement covering, where appropriate, all the grounds against the grant of the European patent. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 4:01 pm
perhaps not quite as titillating letters to these users asking for financial compensation for the allegedly copyright infringing downloads, (so-called “Abmahnungen”). [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Therefore, the request for remittal is rejected.The patent was finally revoked.Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In this respect, the present situation is different from that considered in the decisions T 245/87, T 329/94 and T 238/06, referred to by the appellant.Enteral feeding is used to provide nutrition to patients who cannot obtain nutrition by mouth or are unable to swallow safely. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
T 227/88; T 472/88 and T 922/94). [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 9:48 am by Cyrus Farivar
“Overall, between 4 to 6 percent of all consumers have decreased their downloading as a result of the blocking, whereas for 94 to 96 percent of the population the blocking has had no effect on their behavior,” the researchers wrote. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 6:15 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Earlier this year, President Obama proposed an increase in federal cigarette taxes by 94 cents a pack to finance an expansion of preschool education. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The cases underlying decisions J 9/94 and J 10/94 concerned a situation in which the action – an order by a French Court to freeze the accounts of the appellant company – at least formally did not affect the legal capacity of the appellant. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 6:00 am by LTA-Editor
That $.94 per use isn’t looking so bad after all! [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This is an appeal against the decision of the Receiving Section (RS) refusing to treat an application as a divisional application.On May 26, 2010, a third party had requested a stay of proceedings concerning the parent application, a few days after the Examining Division had issued a decision to grant.On June 8, 2010, the applicant filed a divisional application.The mention of the grant of the parent application was published in the Bulletin.On June 10, 2010, the Legal Division informed the parties… [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In case T 525/94 it was held that an appeal filed in the name of a company that had been dissolved was inadmissible. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
He cannot as a rule (generell) invoke his ignorance of the law nor may he refrain from taking reasonable (zumutbar) measures for keeping time limits (J 5/94 [3.1]; J 15/08 [3.2.1]; J 8/09 [4.2]).[3.4] A system for monitoring pending time limits is part of the reasonable measures for keeping time limits. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Any resemblance to the IPKat is completely fortuitous.In this case the applicant did not reply in due time to a communication pursuant to A 94(3). [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The appellant argued that this portion expressed the legitimate expectation to the effect that any first extension of a time limit set for filing observations to a communication pursuant to A 94(3) would be granted. [read post]
23 May 2013, 7:52 am by Nicole Kellner-Swick
By Douglas Hattaway, Attorney According to a 2012 poll by CUNA Mutual Group, 94% of credit unions are investing time and money in Facebook as part of their marketing strategy, and only 1% of credit unions were not planning on using social media in 2013[1] . [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
There is no second glass plate.Neither document shows two glass plates that are bonded in the form of a laminated glass pane or that the electrical means are mounted on an electrically conducting coating of the second glass plate in portions opposite the transparent and/or half-reflecting portions of the first glass plate.Thus the combination of both documents cannot have these features either and cannot, therefore, lead to the claimed subject-matter in an obvious way.[5.9] As none of the attacks… [read post]
18 May 2013, 3:42 pm by admin
We rely on our mobile phones not just to communicate with others but to email, surf the net, text, download movies and music, and catch the headlines. [read post]
8 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
From this it becomes clear that the EBA took note of the case law at that time but in fact did not approve of an unlimited application of this principle, but rather followed the ratio decidendi of J 12/94, see G 2/97 [4.2]. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This is an appeal against the revocation of the opposed patent. [read post]