Search for: "Downloader 96" Results 161 - 180 of 352
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This is an appeal against the decision of the Receiving Section (RS) refusing to treat an application as a divisional application.On May 26, 2010, a third party had requested a stay of proceedings concerning the parent application, a few days after the Examining Division had issued a decision to grant.On June 8, 2010, the applicant filed a divisional application.The mention of the grant of the parent application was published in the Bulletin.On June 10, 2010, the Legal Division informed the parties… [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
T 556/95, T 798/95, T 394/96 and T 355/03).[4] It follows from the above that, for determining the completion of proceedings before the decision-making department, it has to be established when the decision was handed over by the formalities section to the EPO postal service for notification.[5] The appellant submitted that, in accordance with established case law (G 12/91 [9.1]; T 556/95 [6]; T 394/96 [4]) as well as with established EPO practice, the date of termination of… [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 7:23 am by Bill Marler
An Introduction to Listeria Listeria (pronounced liss-STEER-ē-uh) is a gram-positive rod-shaped bacterium that can grow under either anaerobic (without oxygen) or aerobic (with oxygen) conditions. [4, 18] Of the six species of Listeria, only L. monocytogenes (pronounced maw-NO-site-aw-JUH-neez) causes disease in humans. [18] These bacteria multiply best at 86-98.6 degrees F (30-37 degrees C), but also multiply better than all other bacteria at refrigerator temperatures, something that allows… [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
T 302/93 [2.4 et seq.] and T 1069/96 [2.3.3]).[10] In the present case the notice of opposition consisted of only the four-page form and two additional sheets listing as evidence documents D1 to D26. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 5:02 am by Susan Brenner
’ If the file does not completely download but remains in the `incomplete’ folder, the user can view the part of the file that did actually download. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
(c) Decision T 233/96 is of no importance to the present case. [read post]
23 May 2013, 8:02 am
”The complete 63-page survey report is available for download here. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
There is no second glass plate.Neither document shows two glass plates that are bonded in the form of a laminated glass pane or that the electrical means are mounted on an electrically conducting coating of the second glass plate in portions opposite the transparent and/or half-reflecting portions of the first glass plate.Thus the combination of both documents cannot have these features either and cannot, therefore, lead to the claimed subject-matter in an obvious way.[5.9] As none of the attacks… [read post]
12 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In the present decision Board 3.3.04 had to decide on an application in the field of homeopathic drugs. [read post]
7 May 2013, 10:30 pm by Tony Corbo
The guest op-ed piece by former UDSA Under Secretary for Food Safety Richard Raymond entitled, “Can We Talk Turkey? [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Normally I do not present decisions of the Disciplinary Board, but I found this one quite entertaining.The appeal was filed by a candidate who had failed the EQE 2009 after having been awarded the following marks: A: 49; B: 55; C: 39; D: 57.*** Translation of the German original ***[2.1] The appellant pointed out that the (fictitious) client’s letter on which paper A was based clearly and unambiguously indicated that the client did not desire to obtain patent protection for the process using… [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This very long – 123 pages – decision contains lots of interesting procedural aspects (it’s one of those decisions where the appellants are desperate enough to invoke Article 6 of the Human Rights Convention, which is never a good sign) and is well worth skimming through. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This is another examination appeal. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
”The communication pursuant to R 51(4) EPC 1973 for the earlier application n° 96 401 179.5 is dated March 30, 2001; the mention of the grant has been published on October 17, 2001. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 12:31 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
As science journal budgets go up, strapped libraries spend less on monograph, so the ave. run is now 300 copies, $96. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
During this conversation the drawing referred to as D8 (drawing EKM-Ps-96/08 with handwritten remarks) was used as a basis for the discussions with Seondo. [read post]