Search for: "Duty v. General Finance Company" Results 161 - 180 of 687
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2021, 4:30 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Moreover, the existence of an oral agreement is generally a question of fact. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 8:49 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In United Steelworkers Local 2251 v Algoma Steel Inc., in an arbitration of a dual Canadian-American citizen working in Canada, but living on the American border. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 4:05 pm by Amy Howe
Shareholders in the company have challenged both the constitutionality of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which Congress created to oversee the two companies, and the FHFA’s 2012 agreement with the Treasury Department, which the shareholders say “nationalized” Fannie and Freddie. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Rule 506(b) prohibits the use of “general advertising or general solicitation. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 4:32 am by Peter Mahler
Bannon in Matter of Cayne v 510 Park Avenue Corp., the court dismissed Cayne’s petition on the grounds that his “overly broad” demand for records was “supported only by speculation” of mismanagement by the co-op’s board. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 8:42 am by Shannon O'Hare
 Re-registration typically triggers stamp duty taxes. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 2:06 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  As a general matter, the cases tend to fall into one of three categories: (1) lawsuits against companies that experienced a COVID outbreak in one of its facilities (such as, for example, cruise ship lines and private prison systems); (2) lawsuits against companies that made public statements suggesting the companies could profit from the pandemic (such as vaccine development companies, as well as manufacturers of personal protective equipment or… [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 1:15 pm by Kevin LaCroix
A version of this article previously was published as a Beale & Company client alert. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The Puzzle of Squaring Blockchain with the General Data Protection Regulation, Jurimetrics Journal, 2020, Raffi Teperdjian, George Washington University, Law School. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 1:42 am by UKSC Blog
This appeal considers the circumstances in which the UK-domiciled parent company of a multi-national group of companies may owe a common law duty of care to individuals who allegedly suffer serious harm as a result of alleged systemic health, safety and environmental failings of one of its overseas subsidiaries as the operator of a joint venture operation. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Judge Anderson’s decision hinges on whether Mandiant’s work was merely general consulting services and directed by Capital One (and thereby not protected by the work product doctrine) or was instead in anticipation of litigation and directed by counsel (and thereby considered attorney-client work product). [read post]