Search for: "E Cochran" Results 161 - 180 of 201
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2009, 8:30 am
Witnesses testifying at the hearing included: Dale E. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 11:44 pm
Casey writes:According to the formal charges by the Commission on Judicial Conduct, Judge Cathy Cochran at 11:29 a.m. e-mailed to Keller and her other colleagues an Internet link to the Kentucky Supreme Court decision that was being appealed to the U.S. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 10:04 am
Here's what Lilly had to say (courtesy of the National Women's Law Center):Ladies, a few E-mails might be in order! [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:43 pm
Higgins of Blank Rome in his Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog New Year, New Governor, New E-Mail Policies? [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Loufrani, Oppositions Nos. 91150278, 91154632, and 91152145 [Two Wal-Mart oppositions to registration of the SMILEY & Design mark shown below left (face design disclaimed) for hundreds of identified goods and services, on the grounds of likely confusion with Opposer's previously-used design mark (below right) and failure to function as a mark (lack of inherent distinctiveness); Loufrani opposition to registration of the design mark shown below right for "retail department store… [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 3:55 pm
It's fun to read and e-mail your lawyer frieds about. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 10:04 pm
Did the court of appeals err in holding that the term government "instrument" in Texas Penal Code §32.21(e)(3) (forgery) is a broad term that encompasses the "government record[s]" in §32.21(e)(2)? [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 12:37 am
Section 501.014(e) of the Government Code allows such an order, but the Tenth Court of Appeals held that such an order was "void" because it violated the due process guarantees of notice and the right to be heard. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 9:00 pm
----------------------------------------RACENAMEJudge, Court of Criminal Appeals Place 3Tom Price - IncumbentREP2,599,94451.10%3,940,95451.62%Susan StrawnDEM2,361,62946.41%3,477,42645.55%Matthew E. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:40 pm
"); Diehr, 450 U.S. at 192 (holding that use of mathematical formula in process "transforming or reducing an article to a different state or thing" constitutes patent-eligible subject matter); see also Flook, 437 U.S. at 589 n.9 ("An argument can be made [that the Supreme] Court has only recognized a process as within the statutory definition when it either was tied to a particular apparatus or operated to change materials to a 'different state or thing'");… [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 8:50 am
" Thus, if a party claims that a witness, like the complainant in Klein, rendered incorrect testimony because she was mistaken, her testimony would not be a fabrication because she would not have the purpose to deceive. ...I think that defense counsel's position could be construed as an argument that the complainant was subject to an improper influence, but I don't see how it could be construed as an argument that the complainant's testimony was a recent fabrication that was… [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(UC Davis)Thompson Tim (Northwestern University)Tschoegl Adrian E. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 10:58 pm
The STOP Stroke Act is bipartisan legislation by Senators Thad Cochran (R-Miss.) and Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) that would help ensure that all stroke patients are treated as quickly and effectively as possible. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 12:00 pm
The following fall legislative outlook has been supplied by the Brain Injury Association of America: Dear Advocates:This special Fall Outlook Special Edition of BIAA's Policy Corner E-Newsletter contains numerous legislative updates on congressional activity which took place in the days right before the beginning of the summer recess period. [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 4:58 pm
If you are a specialist and would like to be added to our list please e-mail me your contact information at [Robert@dioriofirm.com] The Law Offices of Robert A. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 7:01 am
Reports Texas Lawyer:The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has defused a heated debate that has raged in blogs and e-mails to CCA judges over a proposal to eliminate a special rule of privilege in criminal cases. [read post]