Search for: "ECUADORIAN PLAINTIFFS"
Results 161 - 180
of 217
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2014, 3:24 am
In February 2011, the Ecuadorian trial court awarded the plaintiffs an $18 billion judgment (later reduced to $9 billion) against Chevron. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 11:29 am
Ecuador Plaintiffs’ lawyer James Tyrrell stated yesterday that “The Ecuadorean plaintiffs are not coming to New York to enforce this judgment. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 10:03 pm
In 2001 the New York court dismissed the action for forum non conviens and the plaintiffs subsequently tried again in Ecuadorian court. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Plaintiffs From Enforcing Non-U.S. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 4:58 am
For example, the Second Circuit ruled against Chevron in its on-going dispute with Ecuadorian plaintiffs, and the US court talked about “comity” and respect for other legal systems in its opinion. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Plaintiffs From Enforcing Non-U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 10:56 am
Can you explain why you have changed your mind, aside from wanting to drag this case out as long as possible with utter disregard for the rights of the plaintiffs? [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 10:21 am
Judge Kennedy also ruled that Patton Boggs could not amend its complaint to allege that Chevron and Gibson Dunn had tortiously interfered with its contract with the Ecuadorian plaintiffs and had engaged in a civil conspiracy, since Patton Boggs had not alleged facts suggesting that they had caused any actual breach of the contract. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:01 am
Washington Post: Patton Boggs' acquisition of a high-powered lobbying group has led to a conflicts battle as Patton steps into the plaintiff's side of the Ecuadorian toxic tort case. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 4:00 am
Plaintiffs' complaint alleged that, years after the buy-out of their interest, Telmex's alleged dishonesty was exposed as a result of an audit of Conecel by the Ecuadorian tax authority which allegedly revealed that Conecel's true financial results in 2001-03 were considerably better than represented by Telmex when it offered to purchase plaintiffs' interests. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
There is no discussion of choice of law in the case — the Court of Appeals applies New York law throughout without discussion of the nationality of the plaintiffs, where the relevant events occurred, whether the law of the plaintiffs’ domicile was the same or different. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
In applying French law to the plaintiff’s claims, the Court looked to prior FSIA decisions for guidance, but the Court also applied the categories of damages recognized under French law. [read post]
26 May 2011, 1:25 pm
The Ecuadorian plaintiffs contend that the district Court misstated the law regarding waiver of the attorney-client privilege, causing it to omit fairness considerations in its analysis, and that consequently its ruling that the attorney-client privilege was waived for all documents in Kohn's file related to the Lago Agrio litigation primarily on the basis of the filming of the documentary Crude, which chronicled the Lago Agrio litigation, was too … [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Plaintiffs From Enforcing Non-U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 7:04 am
Absent a preliminary injunction, Chevron would be forced to defend itself and litigate the enforceability of the Ecuadorian judgment in multiple proceedings. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 8:30 am
(This conclusion is even stronger where the plaintiffs orchestrated or directly participated in the foreign fraud.) [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 2:22 pm
” The Lago Agrio plaintiffs appealed. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 4:00 am
, 2010 NY Slip Op 04719 (1st Dept June 3, 2010), which involved a dispute over a buyout between members of a Delaware LLC that owned an Ecuadorian mobile telephone company. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 8:50 am
” Mastro should certainly be satisfied given that, by his own calculation, plaintiffs’ counsel was in 70 percent of Crude. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
If such an order is issued, and Ecuador enters the Lago Agrio litigation in support of Chevron, it will still be for the Ecuadorian courts to determine the effect (if any) of such developments on the case pending before them. [read post]
