Search for: "EDINBURGH v. STATE" Results 161 - 180 of 189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
Since both the United States and India are federations, invariably the Superior Courts in those jurisdictions are called on to decide when there appears to be any conflict between state and federal legislation or a question of legislative competence arises. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:28 am by CMS
In England & Wales, Gina Millar (the businesswoman who brought the UK Supreme Court appeal of R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5) also raised proceedings, following the Queen’s signing of the Order in Council. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:01 am by INFORRM
An employment tribunal began hearing her case in Edinburgh in May 2019. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:49 am by CMS
Aidan O’Neill QC argues that following the case of Andy Wightman MSP and others v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU it is clear that the Article 50 notification can be withdrawn at any time. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:13 am by INFORRM
Baroness Hale and others of course rejected such a notion obiter in Campbell and the High Court in the JK Rowling (Murray v Express Newspapers) case struck out JK Rowling’s claim on behalf of her young son after she was photographed in the street in Edinburgh, pushing him in his pram. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 7:13 am by jgconrad
 -sd] In her blog on “Pushing the Envelope: Innovation in Legal Search” (2009) [1], Edinburgh Informatics Ph.D. candidate K. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am by Legal Beagle
Macreath was represented at the Court of Session by Edinburgh law firm Simpson & Marwick, one of whose partners told MSPs at the Scottish Parliament HERE that ‘asbestos is good for you’. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 12:41 am by CMS
He refers to R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, noting it is consistent with the UK Government position. 1449: David Johnston QC refers to the Fixed Term Parliaments Act 2011 in accordance with which dissolution must take place. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
As discussed here, in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:00 pm by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix.
This devolution jurisdiction was first exercised by the Privy Council to rule on allegations of Convention rights violations by the prosecution in both solemn procedure (Montgomery v HMA 2001 SC (PC) 1, 19 October 2000) and summary criminal procedure (Brown v Stott 2001 SC (PC) 43, 5 December 2000). [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 3:53 am by Legal Beagle
He tried to get the court action against him postponed for a year, but Lord Doherty refused to grant the request.Mr McKenzie then faced a court action at the Edinburgh court. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 12:37 pm by Matthias Weller
In the following session, Ralf Michaels, Hamburg, and Verónica Ruiz Abou-Nigm, Edinburgh, posed the question “Is Private International Law International? [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 4:10 pm
It will be interesting to see how he gets on with ‘Mad Max’, the Duke of Edinburgh. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
The judgment has been published: Re: The Will of His late Royal Highness The Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh [2021] EWHC 77 (Fam). [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]