Search for: "Eastern Generation, LLC" Results 161 - 180 of 872
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2020, 9:16 am by Fraud Fighters
(AECOM), along with subsidiary Waste Treatment Completion Company, LLC (WTCC), have agreed to pay $57.75 million to resolve fraud allegations for overcharging the U.S. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 4:14 pm by Bona Law PC
Author: Luis Blanquez If you read our articles regularly, you know an antitrust compliance policy is a strong tool to educate directors and employees to avoid risks of anticompetitive conduct. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 2:02 pm
., appeals an order of the Superior Court (McNamara, J.) dismissing its claims for damages representing the cost of recreating lost data and lost business and negligence against the defendant, Pittsburgh Networks, LLC. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 10:31 am by Jeremy T. Rosenblum
Capital One Funding, LLC, the federal district court for the Eastern District of New York  joined the federal district court for the Western District of New York in Petersen v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:54 am by Fraud Fighters
Attorney Matthew Schneider for the Eastern District of Michigan in a press release on the settlement. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 10:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Hal Poret, Hal Poret LLC, survey expert.http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default? [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 3:13 am
Rebecca Tushnet, Professor of First Amendment Law, Harvard Law SchoolPeter Golder, Marketing Professor, Tuck Dartmouth.Hal Poret, Hal Poret LLC, survey expert. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 6:40 pm by Ben Vernia
Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General (OIG), which will remain in effect for five years. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 2:10 pm by Lindsay Griffiths
They also have expertise in debt and equity financings, securities offerings, corporate governance, SEC compliance, shareholder and partnership agreements and LLC operating agreements. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Judge Anderson’s decision hinges on whether Mandiant’s work was merely general consulting services and directed by Capital One (and thereby not protected by the work product doctrine) or was instead in anticipation of litigation and directed by counsel (and thereby considered attorney-client work product). [read post]