Search for: "English v. Jacobs" Results 161 - 180 of 263
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2014, 11:40 am
I accept that, for the reasons explained by Jacob J in Bristol-Myers Squibb and Lord Hoffmann in Kirin-Amgen, courts should be cautious before relying upon prosecution history as an aid to construction. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:35 am by Amy Howe
Jacobs of Greenwire and Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am by Amy Howe
Jacobs of Greenwire, the Associated Press (via NBC News), and Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:16 am
”This purports to follow the guidance of the General Court in Case T-152/11 “MAD” (sadly not available in English, although referred to in the current OHIM Guidelines on Proof of Use, see page 41).What is the meaning of this??! [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 3:25 pm
However, the CJEU's decision in Roche v Primus rejected this strategy. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:46 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston previewed the case for this blog, and I did the same in Plain English. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 4:54 pm
 CommentAlthough this decision may appear harsh given that the elements of Claim 7 were disclosed in the US application, the AmeriKat questions whether it is correct to characterize this decision as\indicative of an increasingly strict treatment of priority in the English courts. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:29 am
On that hypothesis, it would have been difficult to defend the guidance given by the Court of Appeal in Glaxo Group Ltd v Genentech Inc [2008] Bus LR 888 to the effect that the English court should normally refuse a stay of its own proceedings if it would be likely to resolve the question of validity significantly earlier. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:46 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle reported on the argument for this blog, while I added a Plain English recap. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
In patent academic circles, this has sometimes been referred to as the “Angora Cat” approach as noted by Lord Justice Jacob in European Central Bank v Document Security Systems Inc, [2008] EWCA Civ 192, where he said, at paragraph 5 of the report: Professor Mario Franzosi likens a patentee to an Angora cat. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:15 am
There have been times when it appeared that Lord Justice Jacob was its only proponent. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:05 am
For more information of the historical origins of section 60(2), see a beast of a judgment from Jacob LJ in Grimme Landmaschinefabrik BmbH v Scott [2010] EWCA Civ 1110. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am by INFORRM
Robert Sharp, also of English PEN, has dissected some of the detail here and here. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:43 am
 But whatever happened to the original litigation in Brüstle v Greenpeace? [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:54 am
AskSir Robin Jacob ...Swearing in. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 5:43 am
This decision, at paras 37 to 47, also brings UK law more closely in line with equivalent Bundesgerichtshof (German Supreme Court) case law including Schütz v Mauser (Pallet Container II) Case X ZR 97/11, in July 2012 [by pure coincidence, a full English translation of this ruling was published in the January 2013 issue of JIPLP]. [read post]