Search for: "Epp v. Epp"
Results 161 - 180
of 519
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2018, 3:09 pm
” Law professor Garrett Epps has this essay online at The Atlantic. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:45 am
Dan Epps and Ian Samuel of First Mondays guest-blogged from 9 to 9:30 a.m. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:02 am
” In the latest episode of First Mondays, Dan Epps and Ian Samuel discuss what last week’s decision in contracts-clause case Sveen v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 5:24 am
” And Dahlia Lithwick has a jurisprudence essay titled “Fraud Fiction Becomes Purge Reality: The Supreme Court’s decision in Husted v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:06 am
In Husted v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 10:39 am
In doing so, he relied heavily the Supreme Court's recent decision in Murphy v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am
The first was Hughes v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 7:55 am
Zinke and Jennings v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 4:20 am
For The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin reports that in Collins v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 4:18 am
Epic Systems v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 3:53 am
In Epps v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 12:30 pm
Legal scholar Garrett Epps and Slate commentator Mark Joseph Stern see Murphy v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:27 am
Court-watchers continue to focus on Monday’s ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am
In Murphy v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 4:26 am
” At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr reports that in Frank v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:29 am
At Real Clear Policy, Nathan Chapman argues that Justice Neil Gorsuch’s separate concurrence in Sessions v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am
The first is Lucia v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm
Garrett Epps, in The Atlantic, on The Travel Ban's Ignominious Precedents. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 5:49 pm
We blogged in February about Epps v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:21 am
At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps recalls several times when “government has decided to lower the boom on unpopular racial or religious groups,” and notes that “[s]urvivors of three of these previous episodes have filed amicus briefs [in the travel-ban case, Trump v. [read post]
