Search for: "F.C.C."
Results 161 - 180
of 186
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
By Chris Sagers[1] In the world there are weightier things than antitrust, and the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh involves many of them. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:59 am
F.C.C. (1969). [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
” F.C.C. v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 7:47 am
The connection between the two is already clear from Roberts’ dissenting opinion in F.C.C. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 6:05 am
F.C.C., 582 F.3d 490, 498 (3d Cir. 2009)(finding that a determination that the statutory language was unambiguous negates consideration of arguments concerning statutory purpose, non-binding case law, and legislative history). [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 2:05 pm
F.C.C., 656 F.2d 807, 813 (D.C. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 4:15 pm
F.C.C., 656 F.2d 807, 813 (D.C. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 9:24 am
F.C.C., 518 U.S. 727, 749 (1996) (plurality opinion) (stating that "public forums are places that the government has opened for use by the public as a place for expressive activity" (internal quotation marks omitted)); S. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:36 am
’ F.C.C. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
The D.C. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
The D.C. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:44 pm
F.C.C. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:05 pm
F.C.C., 750 F.2d 70, 79-80 (D.C.Cir.1984) the court described a six-factor test for evaluating unreasonable delay.) [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 4:46 pm
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Federal Communications Commission's policy prohibiting "fleeting expletives" is arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act for "failing to articulate a reasoned basis for its change in policy. [read post]
3 May 2017, 10:47 am
F.C.C., 512 U.S. 622 (1994) (At the heart of the First Amendment lies the principle that each person should decide for himself or herself the ideas and beliefs deserving expression, consideration or adherence…. [read post]
22 May 2020, 9:56 am
F.C.C., 518 U.S. 727, 778 (1996) (parallel citations omitted). [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 10:05 pm
F.C.C., 656 F.2d 807, 813 (D.C. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 8:25 am
F.C.C., 512 U.S. 622, 642, 114 S.Ct. 2445, 129 L.Ed.2d497 (1994)). [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:39 pm
Responsibility of the Swiss Manufacturer? [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
How many times have we heard that, in deciding preemption issues the "purpose" or "intent" of congress is the "ultimate touchstone" that the courts must respect? [read post]
