Search for: "FIRST AND FOURTEENTH COURTS OF APPEALS OF TEXAS" Results 161 - 180 of 486
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2020, 9:47 am by Eric Goldman
Sovereign Immunity and the Fourteenth Amendment Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits a state from depriving any person of property without due process of law; while section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment gives Congress the power to enforce its provisions “by appropriate legislation. [read post]
22 May 2017, 7:39 pm by John Floyd
Supreme Court vacated the judgment of the Maryland Court of Appeals and remanded the case for further proceedings, even though the court did not agree on an opinion. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 8:26 am
The Fourteenth Court rejected that legal argument. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 10:57 am by MOTP
TEXAS CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL AND BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, RESPONDENTS 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 PER CURIAM JUSTICE GUZMAN did not participate in this decision. [read post]
2 May 2019, 12:31 pm by MOTP
   QUANTUM MERUIT REMEDY ALSO MIS-APPROPRIATED FOR CONSUMER DEBT COLLECTION - BY AN ALLEGED ASSIGNEE OF BANK NO LESS  One Texas court of appeals has gone so far as to bless quantum meruit as an alternative theory for the collection of a bank debt, even though quantum meruit is an equitable theory and is generally precluded when a contract governs the parties’ relationship because a suit to enforce the contract provides an adequate legal… [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:53 am by Edith Roberts
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, Willett has made a point of writing separately to declare his principles. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 10:59 am by John Floyd
The appeals court also ruled that the Harris County Sheriff could not be sued under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last fall, the Supreme Court denied applications for review from multiple states in which federal appeals courts had found a constitutional right to same-sex marriage. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last fall, the Supreme Court denied applications for review from multiple states in which federal appeals courts had found a constitutional right to same-sex marriage. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 4:51 am by Heidi Henson
Supreme Court’s decisions in Washington v Seattle Sch Dist No 1 (1982) and Hunter v Erickson (1969), the appeals court found that Proposal 2 unconstitutionally altered Michigan’s political structure by impermissibly burdening racial minorities. [read post]
19 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm by John Floyd
District Court Judge Lee Rosenthal found that the county’s money-bail system violates Texas statutory and constitutional law, and the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:55 am by NCC Staff
Mapp was convicted of possessing obscene materials and faced up to seven years in prison before she appealed her case on the argument that she had a First Amendment right to possess the material. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 9:07 pm
 While the Supreme Court's jurisdiction is normally "appellate" -- meaning that it has power to review decisions on appeal from lower courts -- "original" jurisdiction refers to the (rather rare) type of cases which must be commenced at the outset in the U.S. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 3:47 pm by John Floyd
  County Fights Against Reform   Harris County appealed Judge Rosenthal’s ruling to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 2:00 am
 While the Supreme Court's jurisdiction is normally "appellate" -- meaning that it has power to review decisions on appeal from lower courts -- "original" jurisdiction refers to the (rather rare) type of cases which must be commenced at the outset in the U.S. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 8:32 am by Jonathan Bailey
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: 5th Circuit Set to Referee ‘Egregious’ 12th Man Copyright Case First off today, Barbara Grzincic at Reuters reports that historian Michael Bynum is asking the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals to revive his lawsuit against Texas A&M University over the university’s use of his book. [read post]
29 May 2008, 6:22 am
In a ruling Thursday reversing the verdict, the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Texas ruled that there was “no competent evidence that a blood clot triggered by Vioxx ingestion” caused Mr. [read post]