Search for: "FRIEDMAN v. UNITED STATES"
Results 161 - 180
of 651
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
But he is also attentive to institutional (and political) “constraint” that may lead the Court on occasion to avoid fidelity in order to protect itself by remaining within what is viewed (who actually does the viewing is, of course, a key question, as Jack elaborates) as "public opinion" (which Barry Friedman emphasized in his relatively recent book) or, more likely, the wishes of dominant political elites. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
WadeandPlanned Parenthood v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
United States, the court held 7-2 that to convict a defendant in U.S. illegally for violating a federal gun-possession law, prosecutors must show that defendant knew he was in the country illegally. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 8:20 am
In State v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 6:48 am
Our Supreme Court recently decided State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 10:17 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 10:59 am
” [United States v.] [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
If the Supreme Court is an elite largely influenced by elites, the United States is not a democracy in the classical Aristotelean sense, but a mixed regime where aristocrats and plebes both participate in governance. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:45 pm
Lewis v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:45 pm
Lewis v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:14 am
Rubio, it would “empower state and local governments in the United States to counter the anti-Israel boycott, divestment and sanctions movement’s discriminatory economic warfare against the Jewish state. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 12:49 pm
On February 20, 2019, the United States Supreme Court decided Timbs v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
David Friedman (Israel) is a bankruptcy lawyer. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 7:57 am
The Assembly recalls that the European Court of Human Rights has already stated in Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and others v. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 7:41 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 3:43 am
United States, the justices ruled 5-4 yesterday that a state-law robbery conviction can qualify as a “violent felony” for the purposes of a sentencing enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act even when the conviction does not require the use of violent force. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 10:47 am
" See Friedman, 136 S. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 10:16 am
Friedman, 2002 SCC 59 (CanLII), [2002] 3 S.C.R. 109; Johnson v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:08 pm
" [United States v.] [read post]
