Search for: "FTC v. AT&T Mobility" Results 161 - 180 of 282
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Extended Version:The 2016 FTC v AT&T Mobility decision at the 9th Circuit eliminated the Federal Trade Commission’s authority to enforce privacy rules on ISPs in Arizona, Alaska, Hawaii, California, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington. [read post]
7 May 2021, 12:39 am by Florian Mueller
People whom I suspected to be Qualcomm employees even created a "Mlorian Fueller" parody account with an Apple logo as a picture during the 2019 FTC v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 7:44 am by Lorraine Fleck
http://cnet.co/MTmtcE  Laws on Wi-Fi sniffing still up in the air, say specialists http://cnet.co/T3d0QT  Former Apple designer: I won’t testify at Samsung trial http://cnet.co/T3d03t  US | Samsung Galaxy Nexus eludes sales ban…for now http://cnet.co/T3cItx  Hacker delves into secret world of warranties http://cnet.co/T3cEdg  Hackers accused of stealing data from 9M Korean mobile users http://cnet.co/T3czGp  US | Cybersecurity bill… [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:09 pm by Berin Szoka
That’s exactly what Facebook began offering when it updated its privacy controls late last year, bu that didn’t stop EPIC from rushing to the FTC to insist that the company start over on its privacy controls—and that government bureaucrats start making user interface decisions. [read post]
1 May 2023, 3:30 am by Florian Mueller
But Nvidia--I repeat, the world's leading AI chipset maker--can now see that the CMA will also make crazy decisions when other jurisdictions simply clear the deal (apart from the U.S., but the FTC doesn't matter because they can't block without a court ruling).Arm is now going public in the U.S., not on the London Stock Exchange. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 1:01 am by Florian Mueller
And some of what Huawei says is really interesting (this post continues below the document): 18-09-28 PanOptis v. [read post]
1 May 2021, 7:19 am by Florian Mueller
But there are three arguments against it, any single one of which is reason enough for Apple to internalize 100% of DST:Contractual: DST wasn't foreseeable when Apple set its original App Store terms (i.e., at a time when Apple claims it didn't have market power).Policy (legislative intent): Lawmakers wanted "GAFA" companies to internalize those taxes. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 9:17 am by Eric
Keynote: Joe Farrell (speaking for himself, not the FTC) Economics assumes consumer sovereignty. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 9:37 pm by Glenn
Google Is Evil (op-ed) | http://t.co/SZD0ajhP http://t.co/lWYorYUE 19:33:27, 2012-06-13 Judge Says Chase Can't Use Facebook To Serve Notice (of Lawsuit) http://t.co/LzqPS4Wi 13:40:08, 2012-06-13 Apple Blasts Motorola's Stance On Essential Patents http://t.co/bQNeNvXp 12:35:08, 2012-06-13 FTC Blasts Androgel Pay-For-Delay Ruling In 11th Circ. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 4:10 am
– Laura Malone of Associated Press speaks at FTC conference on future of news (Ars Technica) Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rules FCC had no right to sanction Comcast for P2P blocking (Ars Technica) (EFF) (Public Knowledge) (Public Knowledge) (TorrentFreak) (IP Spotlight)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC rules AdWords doesn’t infringe bidding patent: Bid for Position, LLC v AOL, LLC et al (Ars Technica)   US Patents –… [read post]