Search for: "Fallen v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 665
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2014, 4:58 pm by Wells Bennett
Mark Martins, had this to say on the eve of a pre-trial motions hearing in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 5:32 am by Rosalind English
ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4 (1 February 2011) – Read judgment This case (see yesterday’s summary) is illustrative of two misconceptions about rights that we are all in thrall to from time to time. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 1:26 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKBusiness Law Investment Company Breached SBA Regulations; Injunctive Relief Granted, Receiver Appointed United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
The departure from Abdulaziz  The Secretary of State relied on Abdulaziz v United Kingdom (1985) 7 EHRR 471 in which the Strasbourg Court held that there was no lack of respect for family life in denying entry to foreign spouses. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 2:05 pm
The first, referred to as “contributory negligence” has, for the most part, fallen by the wayside and is only still followed in five jurisdictions in the United States. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
This chapter explores this general development through detailed consideration of the particular case of Pierce v State (1843) 13 NH 536. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 10:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
The Bladensburg Peace CrossThe Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that a cross-shaped monument may be preserved on public land because it does not violate the Constitution's Establishment Clause.Cultural property watchers may not have noticed the case of American Legion et al. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 2:56 am by Walter Olson
“Trump promises ‘massive permit reform’ in infrastructure bill” [Melanie Zanona, The Hill] Murr v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:50 am by Lisa R. Pruitt
  That's what Aussies call the natural gas released by fracking, and Aussies are beginning to debate the practice as hotly as we are in the United States. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 6:50 pm by David Post
In 1994, as part of the Uruguay round of the GATT (it’s complicated . . . ), the US implemented Article 18 of Berne in the “Copyright Restoration Act,” restoring copyrights in foreign works that had fallen into the public domain in the United States (at least, if they had fallen into the public domain for reasons other than the expiration of their copyright term.The case has an interesting posture, which bears on what it means. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 6:50 pm by David Post
In 1994, as part of the Uruguay round of the GATT (it’s complicated . . . ), the US implemented Article 18 of Berne in the “Copyright Restoration Act,” restoring copyrights in foreign works that had fallen into the public domain in the United States (at least, if they had fallen into the public domain for reasons other than the expiration of their copyright term.The case has an interesting posture, which bears on what it means. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]