Search for: "Fielding v. Superior Court" Results 161 - 180 of 1,023
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2021, 1:31 am by Rose Hughes
A recent Canadian Federal Court decision (Teva v Pharmascience, 2020 FC 1158) adds yet further nuance to the critical question of when a second-medical use patent application should be filed. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 1:09 pm by Hayleigh Bosher
 To illustrate, the case of CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada [2004] 1 SCR 339 saw the Supreme Court of Canada hand down a judgement that received favourable academic commentary, declaring it a landmark case with far-reaching effects regarding the conceptualisation of exceptions. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 11:01 am by Shalev Roisman
Prakash clearly thinks originalism is a superior alternative—the book is subtitled “An Originalist Argument Against [the Living Presidency’s] Ever-Expanding Powers. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Jane Turner
Greene felt that a federal lawsuit (LaShawn A. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 5:24 am by Chris Seaton
Anyway, all of this culminated with the Supreme Court refusing to make this Bush v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
The Court of Appeals disagreed, finding that the witness was “a qualified expert in the field of forensics and an employee at the North Carolina State Crime Lab, [who] testified to her qualifications in the area of DNA analysis as well as her training and experience in gathering evidence for DNA profiles. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 8:15 pm by Ilya Somin
For example, when I wrote the proposal for what became my book The Grasping Hand, I knew I was challenging the then-overwhelmingly dominant academic view that Kelo v. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 6:12 am by MEL
Harriman, an employer did just that, providing the Ontario Superior Court with a rare opportunity to clarify the law in this area. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 6:57 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed a motion for an injunction on exactly this issue recently, in Black et al. v. [read post]
But both the Court’s ruling and the legislation (AB5) go far beyond the gig economy—impacting workers who are independent contractors in other fields. [read post]