Search for: "First Choice Insurance Services, Inc." Results 161 - 180 of 505
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2014, 1:12 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
First, the Code Section 4980H penalty doesn’t apply as long as the employer either doesn’t have 50 or more full-time employees or non of its full-time employees enroll in subsidized health coverage through a health insurance exchange. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:25 pm by Law Lady
DEVON CONDOMINIUM B ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee. 4th District.Contempt -- Civil -- Where court found defendant in contempt for failing to file fact information sheet as required by court order, it was an abuse of discretion to impose a per diem fine as a coercive civil sanction without giving defendant a reasonable time to purge its contempt and without considering defendant's ability to pay the sanctionCREATIVE CHOICE HOMES, II, LTD., etc., Appellant, vs. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 3:55 pm
The doctrine has been part of our jurisprudence since it was first adopted by this court in Sunnyslope Grading, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am by Michael Douglas
They may be expressed as service of suit clauses… They may provide for arbitration… They may be standard form… They may be bespoke… They may be asymmetric… They may and often will be coupled with choice of law clauses… They may be multi-tiered, providing first for a process of mediation, whether informal or formal, or informal and then formal, before providing for arbitral or judicial dispute resolution… Dispute resolution… [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 8:01 am by Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers
If we cannot secure damages on your behalf, our services will be free of charge. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
Further assurance of competence is provided by mandatory errors and omissions insurance and, it is thought, by mandatory continuing professional development. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 3:31 am
Here are a few court  decisions that have come down since April, 2008, regarding aviation and airport development law: Aerial Banners, Inc. v. [read post]