Search for: "First Holding Corporation" Results 161 - 180 of 18,601
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2020, 12:21 pm by Kevin Kaufman
First, the entity level tax on corporate income increases the cost of capital, leading to less investment and a lower level of output (gross domestic product, or GDP). [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 1:33 pm by The White Law Group
                The post BDCA Changes Name to Franklin BSP Lending Corporation appeared first on The White Law Group. [read post]
23 Dec 2017, 6:30 am by Brianna Smith
” The lawsuit itself was filed against Kmart Corporation, a “wholly owned subsidiary of Sears Holdings Corporation (SHC),” back in 2008. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 11:20 pm by Mike
Alex Wright the victim of corporate manslaughter The first conviction and sentence under the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007, occurred this week when Cotswold Geotechnical Holdings was fined £385,000. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 11:20 pm by Mike
Alex Wright the victim of corporate manslaughter The first conviction and sentence under the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007, occurred this week when Cotswold Geotechnical Holdings was fined £385,000. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 6:06 pm by Francis Pileggi
    The post The Agency Costs of Agency Capitalism and Corporate Law appeared first on Delaware Corporate & Commercial Litigation Blog. [read post]
26 May 2017, 3:21 pm by Floyd Abrams
In holding that the corporate status of an entity could not negate this right, Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion cited twenty-five cases of the Court in which corporations had received full First Amendment protection. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 12:33 pm by IncNow
While entities may hold title to stock as a Shareholder, entities may not be corporate Directors or Officers. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
  This timing compares to the first bladder cancer “claim [being] made known to the company” in September, 2010; and “the first bladder lawsuit was filed during the summer of July 2011. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 11:49 am by Steve Bainbridge
The first part of this analysis determines the optimal structure of corporate liability. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 7:11 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
First, it rejected the proposition that the court has a general power to pierce the corporate veil and that the court could hold the third party contractually liable “in the interests of justice. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 11:34 am
Under this statute, therefore, I don't see how assuming the identify of a corporation or a partnership could ever be prosecuted as identity theft, and I think the same holds for state identity theft statutes, as well.We could, of course, broaden existing identity theft statutes so they encompass the misappropriation of the identity of a corporate or other artificial entity . . . if we thought it was necessary to do so. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:30 am by Jasminka Kalajdzic
A self-described card-carrying member of the Federalist Society and former clerk to Justice Antonin Scalia, Fitzpatrick argues that “class action lawsuits are not only the most effective way to hold corporations accountable; they are also the most conservative way to hold them accountable. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:15 am
  As noted in the first of these posts, Section 312 of the California Corporations Code does not define the term but does require that corporations have certain specified officers. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 10:52 am
The trustee further said that material misrepresentations contained in the company's SEC filings were examples of such failure.In support of its holding that corporate officers are fiduciaries, the court noted that in Walt Disney Co. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 4:08 pm by James Hamilton
In a case of first impression, the Chancery Court held that the notion that the terms of the extra surplus directors would end conflicts with Section 141(b)’s mandate that directors hold office until their successor is elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 6:00 am by Doug Leavitt
   First, corporations only act by individuals so by building its case against these individuals Justice believes that this will ferret out the full extent of corporate misconduct. [read post]