Search for: "Fisher v. Daniels" Results 161 - 180 of 308
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2014, 8:45 am by Steve Kalar
June 24, 2014), decision available here.Players: Decision by Judge Pregerson, joined by Judges Fisher and DJ Daniel. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:51 am by Thomas Hopson
Rumsfeld, Rumsfeld v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 9:21 am by Jon Sands
Torres Pimental, no. 12-50038 (Pregerson with Fisher and Daniel, Sr. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:56 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary comes from Noah Feldman for Bloomberg View, Hera Arsen at the Ogletree Deakins blog, Daniel Fisher of Forbes, and Brian Netter and Reginald Goeke for Mayer Brown’s Class Defense blog. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:15 pm by Thomas Hopson
 Other early coverage comes from Brent Kendall of The Wall Street Journal, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Robert Barnes of The Washington Post, David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, Gerry Smith at The Huffington Post, Daniel Fisher at Forbes, Michael B. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 4:05 am by Amy Howe
Jacobs of Greenwire and Daniel Fisher of Forbes. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 4:58 am by Amy Howe
 Coverage comes from Bill Mears of CNN and Daniel Fisher of Forbes, with commentary from Kristen Osenga at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 6:46 am by Derek Black
The Century Foundation and Lumina Foundation are releasing The Future of Affirmative Action: New Paths to Higher Education Diversity after Fisher v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
  Coverage of the Court’s decision comes from Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST and Daniel Fisher of Forbes, while in his column for Bloomberg View Noah Feldman praises the decision as “show[ing] that there are limits to the extreme formalism that the court has recently adopted in many cases. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:05 am by Amy Howe
  Other coverage of yesterday’s decision comes from Nina Totenberg of NPR, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Bill Mears of CNN, Daniel Fisher of Forbes, and Jaclyn Belcyzk of JURIST. [read post]
29 May 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Thumbing nose at Hill, Interior Dept. moves to tribalize native Hawaiians by decree [Ilya Shapiro, NACRP, related PDF, Hawaii Free Press, also, background] Cellphone 911: “Safety Mandates That May Reduce Safety” [Coyote] Liability-expanding California decision: knowing breach of a material contractual provision may trigger state False Claims Act [Sidley] Plus Chamber’s ILR on state False Claims Acts and more; Feds to GM: write smoking-gun memos for trial lawyers’… [read post]
20 May 2014, 4:39 am by Amy Howe
  Ronald Mann covered the decision for this blog; other coverage comes from Nina Totenberg of NPR and Daniel Fisher of Forbes. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:44 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Fisher, The Good Life Financial Group, Inc., and The Good Life Global Enterprises, LLCCase number: 13-cv-00683 (United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin)Case filed: September 30, 2013Qualifying judgment/order: October 16, 2013 3/24/2014 6/23/2014 2014-24 SEC v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Court will hear case of mariner charged with Sarbanes-Oxley records-destruction violation for discarding undersized fish [Jonathan Adler, Eugene Volokh, Daniel Fisher] SCOTUS goes 9-0 for wider patent fee shifting in Octane Fitness v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:10 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary comes from Mike Sacks for The Daily Beast, Ilya Shapiro at Cato at Liberty, Daniel Fisher at Forbes, Michael Dorf at Verdict, Ruthann Robson at Constitutional Law Prof Blog, and Marci Hamilton at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:02 pm by Andrew Hamm
 Early commentary comes from Megan McArdle of Bloomberg View, Daniel Fisher of Forbes, and J.J. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 4:12 am by Walter Olson
Daniel Fisher explains yesterday’s 5-4 decision by the Supreme Court in McCutcheon v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:53 pm by Andrew Hamm
This morning the Court issued its decision in McCutcheon v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 4:51 am by Amy Howe
” Yesterday the Court issued a decision in United States v. [read post]