Search for: "Fisher-Price, Inc."
Results 161 - 179
of 179
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2007, 6:08 am
Metro Area Personal Injury Law Blog, we have posted articles related to: A recent Fisher-Price / Mattel, Inc. recall of toys made in China due to lead levels An expanded Mattel, Inc. recall including more lead paint and dangerous magnets A recent recall of Thomas & Friends wooden train sets due to lead paintFor information about your legal rights, please click here or call the law firm of Regan Zambri & Long, PLLC at 202-463-3030. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 3:07 am
Mattel's recalls cover several hundred thousand "Sarge" vehicles and almost a million toys from its Fisher-Price line, including popular "Sesame Street" and "Nickelodeon" characters. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 1:17 pm
Metro Area Medical Malpractice Law Blog, we have posted articles relating to: The initial Fisher-Price / Mattel, Inc. toy recall Red yeast rice products recalled over undeclared prescription drug ingredients Expanded Botulism recall of Castleberry's foods The dangers of magnetic toysIf you or a family member believes that you have a case involving injuries from a dangerous or defective product, please contact us on-line at Regan Zambri & Long or… [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 12:23 pm
Metro Area Personal Injury Law Blog, we have posted articles relating to: The initial Fisher-Price / Mattel, Inc. toy recall Thomas & Friends toy train recall over lead paint Easy Bake ovens recalled over serious burn injuries The dangers of magnetic toysIf you or a family member believes that you have a case involving injuries from a dangerous or defective product, please contact us on-line at Regan Zambri & Long or call us at 202-463-3030 for… [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 8:45 am
Toy recall spurs class action against Mattel, Inc. and Fisher-Price Inc. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 7:40 pm
Fisher-Price and its parent company, Mattel, Inc., are recalling 83 kinds of children's toys, including Sesame Street, Sponge Bob and Dora the Explorer figures among others, because surface paint on the toys contains high levels of lead. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 8:50 am
Fisher-Price and its parent company, Mattel, Inc., are recalling 83 kinds of children's toys, including Sesame Street, Sponge Bob and Dora the Explorer figures among others, because surface paint on the toys contains high levels of lead. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 9:54 am
Fisher-Price, Inc. (2007 WL 1345333; May 9, 2007). [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 8:13 am
Fisher-Price, Inc. and Mattel, Inc. and Perfect 10 v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 8:29 am
Affirmed in favor of Fisher-Price. [read post]
25 May 2007, 11:36 am
” In fact, he told delegates of the recent CIP Forum in Sweden that “the judgment in the first CAFC decision [LeapFrog Enterprises Inc v Fisher-Price Inc] on obviousness post-KSR had actually been written before the Supreme Court's decision was handed down and ‘did not require one iota of change’. [read post]
14 May 2007, 3:43 am
Fisher-Price, Inc., et al. (05/09/2007): appeal of judgment of noninfringement and invalidity of claim of patent-in-suit (affirmed); discussion of patent related to a learning device to help young children read phonetically (U.S. [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:10 am
Fisher-Price, Inc. and Mattel, Inc., No. 06-1402 (Fed. [read post]
9 May 2007, 11:55 am
Fisher-Price, Inc., No. 06-1402, Slip Op. [read post]
9 May 2007, 11:47 am
Fisher-Price (Fed. [read post]
9 May 2007, 11:25 am
Fisher-Price, Inc., et al. (06-1402) May 9, 2007Leapfrog appealed the district court's (pre-KSR) finding that claim 25 from US Patent 5,813,861 was invalid:Claim 25. [read post]
9 May 2007, 9:46 am
Fisher-Price, Inc., No. 06-1402 (Fed. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 11:45 am
Smith exploited eBay to sell hundreds of thousands of dollars' worth of counterfeit software at drastically reduced prices, thereby illegally profiting on the back of the copyright holder," Alice Fisher, assistant attorney general at the Justice Department, said in a statement. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 10:20 am
For publication opinions today (2): In MJ Acquisitions, Inc. v. [read post]
