Search for: "Ford v. General Motors" Results 161 - 180 of 612
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2020, 11:36 am by Heather Douglas
However, after jury selection, Premier Ford announced that Toronto would return to a modified Stage 2. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 8:54 pm by Stephen Sachs
Larry Solum has an interesting post on Ford Motor Company v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 3:11 pm
 In the US, the eight factors in Polaroid Corp. v Polarad Elect. [read post]
29 May 2012, 4:48 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
The plaintiff’s complaint unsurprisingly had to name nearly two dozen defendants, from General Motors, to Daimler Chrysler, to Ford, to Napa Auto Parts, to Pneumo Abex, successor of American Brake Shoe and Foundry, founded 1902. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:24 am by Timothy Misner
Although the Supreme Court denied certiorari in Mussat, the Court has an opportunity to provide guidance on the boundaries of specific personal jurisdiction in its upcoming decision in Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:47 am by Robert Kraft
The recall affecting General Motors is getting out of hand, and may threaten the safety of many thousand drivers. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
For the latest appellate analysis on the issue of admissibility of a Defendant’s alleged intoxication in a motor vehicle accident case, see Partlow v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
It has been repeatedly held that the adoption of Rule 411 did not serve to affect the pre-existing and still valid rule of law generally prohibiting the mentioning of insurance in any regard during civil trials, including at motor vehicle accident trials, as in Henery v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
It has been repeatedly held that the adoption of Rule 411 did not serve to affect the pre-existing and still valid rule of law generally prohibiting the mentioning of insurance in any regard during civil trials, including at motor vehicle accident trials, as in Henery v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:12 am by Beth Van Schaack
Ford Motor Company, a case involving corporate complicity in the system of apartheid, for persuasive reasoning in this regard). [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 8:18 am by Julie Lam
 The Michigan Supreme Court remanded Umphrey v General Motors Corp, No. 142694, to the WCAC for additional analysis of defendant’s argument related to the application of MCL 418.361(1). [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 5:50 am by David G. Badertscher
VerdiKINGS COUNTYMotor Vehicles Defendant Entitled to Partial Refund of Lease Payments for Deprivation of Use of Vehicle Ford Motor Credit Co. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 8:25 pm
In that case, Ford Motor Company decided to ignore a design flaw that caused Ford Pintos to catch fire when involved in accidents. [read post]