Search for: "Fox v. Superior Court" Results 161 - 180 of 205
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
Unlike the Brookings report, the list that follows is not based principally on court documents. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 6:04 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently addressed this issue in Bondfield Construction Co. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
The Culture Secretary has made a statement on the Fox/Sky merger review. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 5:00 am by Dan Maurer
Later, in an interview with Fox News in 2016, he defended his actions as simply performing his “end of the bargain”—relying on his judgment, as well as the responsibility entrusted to him by his superiors, to execute his mission “in good faith” given the rules and the “context” in which he was serving. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:55 pm by Gordon Firemark
Blancarte is preparing his appeal to the Superior Court and we will hear more on the plight of the California entertainment lawyer as unlicensed talent agent. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 6:20 am by Jeff Welty
They prevailed before a three-judge panel of the superior court in Wake County and the matter is now before the state supreme court. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Attorney General of CanadaDecision Date: February 21, 2021  The Ontario Superior Court of Justice declared section 91 of the Canada Elections Act, 2000 invalid. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(IP Dragon) Copycats in China: trains, planes and ... automobiles (IP Dragon)   Denmark Copenhagen Maritime and Commercial Court rules Innocent Pictures ApS’ use of ‘Tivoli’ and ‘Tivoli Night’ in context of pornographic broadcasts infringes trade mark rights of Danish amusement park TIVOLI A/S (Class 46) Court finds minimal confusion in MINIMAL case (International Law Office)   Europe ECJ: Promotional items do not… [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am by INFORRM
Canada The Superior Court of Justice, Ontario handed down judgement in Marcellin v LPS et all 2022 ONSC 5886. [read post]