Search for: "Frances L. Held"
Results 161 - 180
of 627
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2016, 2:04 am
Katfriend Oliver Löffel (Löffel Abrar) analyses the legal perils of tweeting using the hashtag #Rio2016 and explores how the position varies in different territories.Compulsory collective management of copyright for images displayed by search engines: a French cultural exception to EU law Katfriend Olivia Klimis and Nicolas Lescot (De Gaulle Fleurance & Associés) take a look at new provisions in the French Intellectual Property Code (IPC) that… [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 12:24 am
The IPKat has been discussing this particular measure a lot, not only for France, and not always with kind words (see for instance here and here). [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 11:07 am
Léonard shared their thoughts on this questions. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:32 am
Attendu qu’est contraire à un principe essentiel du droit français de la filiation, la reconnaissance en France d’une décision étrangère dont la transcription sur les registres de l’état civil français, valant acte de naissance, emporte inscription d’un enfant comme né de deux parents du même sexe In substance, the Court held that a fundamental principle of French law prohibited that… [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 4:43 am
Under the L’Oréal argument he would be liable. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 7:12 am
Gary L. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 6:42 am
Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés (CNIL) clarifies that a search engine operator that is obligated to honor an individual’s request for erasure by “de-referencing” links to his or her personal data (i.e., removing links to web pages containing that personal data from search results) is only required, under the GDPR, to de-reference results on its EU domains (e.g., google.fr in France and google.it in Italy), and not on all of its… [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 9:04 am
In April 2013, Judge James L. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 4:31 am
It held that Barilla’s trade marks should be considered well-known within the meaning of Article 20(c) of the Italian Industrial Property Code, and that the defendant’s behaviour had resulted in the taking of an unfair advantage of their repute. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 6:09 am
This conference was held in Strasbourg and brought together forty participants coming from twenty-one different countries. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 6:48 pm
A second Court of appeal judgment followed, which held that the American judgment violated French public policy. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 7:53 pm
The Court also held that the Court of Appeal had reached an erroneous conclusion based on a misapplication of the facts and a misinterpretation of the law. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 2:28 pm
L 343, p. 10 ff.). [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:58 am
Jennings, and L. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 7:30 am
While some speculate that this increase in interest can be partially attributed to the Miami Association of Realtors’ participation at the Salon National de l’Immobilier conference, which was held this April in Paris, it is certain that a much bigger reason for the French’s interest in purchasing property abroad arises from the staggering tax hikes facing French citizens at home. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 8:29 am
The CFI held that the Commission's decision was sufficiently reasoned and was not manifestly wrong. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 2:59 am
On this day ...... 1789 (220 years ago today), the Constituent Assembly of France adopted the Déclaration des Droits de l'Homme et du Citoyen (left), an instrument that, as I've discussed in this article, remains not only part of the French legal structure, but also a global human rights inspiration, to this day. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 10:00 am
" ... 1808 (200 years ago today), Marie-Jeanne Schellinck became the 1st woman to receive the Légion d'honneur (example at left), France's highest honor. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 12:26 am
The symposium will be held in French on 12 April 2022 at the Amphitheater of the French Higher Council of Notaries (60 boulevard de la Tour-Maubourg – Paris, 7th). [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 9:20 am
The highest court held that the fact that deceptiveness was unaffected by neither time nor use should not be interpreted as lifting statutory limitations on legal proceedings relying on Article L 711-3 as a primary cause of action. [read post]
