Search for: "GIVENS v. WAL-MART STORES, INC" Results 161 - 180 of 356
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2013, 1:33 pm by Greg Mersol
Posted by Greg MersolA Virginia District Court has denied conditional certification of a class of chauffeurs in claims for unpaid overtime and has also recognized the application of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am by Abbott & Kindermann
As the court noted, this was at most the position of one official, not the board of supervisors which as a body, is given the authority to approve ordinances. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 9:19 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
With an eye to the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc v Dukes, the court determined that the plaintiffs could not show anything more than a uniform policy by Hearst of utilizing unpaid internships. [read post]
29 May 2013, 9:56 am by Thomas Kaufman
Gary Klausner, denied certification even though he preliminary concluded that “[t]he putative classes appear to meet the requisites of Rule 23(a),” including the “rigorous” commonality standard established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 1:57 pm by Wystan M. Ackerman
  The cert petition in Ross (see SCOTUSblog page) raised the following issues: “(1) Whether it is consistent with Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 8:25 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Comcast’s cert petition presented the case as a slam-dunk violation of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 9:27 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
 The bell-weather case in that regard is Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 4:20 am by Lorene Park
For example, in Muhammad v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, a federal court sua sponte sanctioned an employee’s attorney who tried to avoid summary judgment by “disingenuously” arguing that an unpleaded gender bias claim had merit and could be pursued simply because the employee checked the Title VII box on his form complaint (WDNY 2012). [read post]