Search for: "Garcia v. Garcia et al" Results 161 - 174 of 174
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2011, 2:00 am
Juan Romagoza, CJA's lead plaintiff in Romagoza et. al. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 10:29 pm
Here’s how I put the point in my contribution to a treatise of which I am a co-author, Lafave, et. al., Criminal Procedure, 4.4(d): [T]he line between content and non-content information is inherently relative. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
HUGH CASSIDY et al., Defendants, Cross-Complainants, and Respondents, WILLIAM STRAW, Cross-Defendant and Appellant. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
HUGH CASSIDY et al., Defendants, Cross-Complainants, and Respondents, WILLIAM STRAW, Cross-Defendant and Appellant. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 11:59 am
Chairman Battista, in finding that the Respondent unlawfully refused to hire the nine discriminatees, relied solely on credited testimony that the Respondent's owner John Gunn, its General Manager Glynn Smith, and its Manager Anthony Soto made several statements evidencing animus to DHL's Manager Hugo Moya, Act Fast Supervisor Omar Juarez, and former Act Fast employee Margarito Garcia. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 3:50 am by Kyle Hulehan
Recent research by economists Javier Garcia-Bernardo, Petr Janský, and Gabriel Zucman shows the driving force behind a reduction in the share of profits that U.S. companies book abroad was repatriations of IP.[10] As trends continue to develop, U.S. policymakers should study them to understand how the TCJA reforms affect the taxes paid by U.S. multinationals, the destination for U.S. outbound investment, and the location of IP. [read post]