Search for: "Garcia v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 825
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
Garcia, which asks whether federal law pre-empts a state prosecution for identity theft for using someone else’s Social Security number. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 8:43 am
The Immigration Reform and Control Act requires employees to verify that they are eligible to work in the United States by submitting a Form I-9, but strictly limits the use of information on or attached to a Form I-9. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 2:29 pm
The act also requires employees to verify that they are eligible to work in the United States by submitting a Form I-9, and it strictly limits the use of information on or attached to a Form I-9. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 10:15 am
By: Amber Barlow Garcia, Deutsch KerriganWhen a lawsuit is filed in state court but federal court is a proper forum, defendants often prefer to remove the case. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 1:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am
Remember United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:54 am
§ 145 encompasses the personnel expenses the United States Patent and Trademark Office incurs when its employees, including attorneys, defend the agency in Section 145 litigation. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am
Lastly, United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
United States, 17-7563, Garcia v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 2:27 am
Pictures, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 7:57 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 2:15 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 9:14 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Francis failed to depart the United States as required by the visa. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 1:21 pm
See United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2018, 5:48 pm
See United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:17 am
” In an op-ed for the Las Vegas Sun, Ruben Garcia argues that“[b]ased on his rulings on the Washington, D.C., Circuit federal court of appeals, Brett Kavanaugh will be highly skeptical of legal protections of workers if he takes a seat on the United States Supreme Court,” “because his rulings show a willingness to depart from decades of precedent that have formed the basis of the New Deal’s protection for workers. [read post]
