Search for: "George v. Jones"
Results 161 - 180
of 505
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2018, 6:47 am
Gustafson’s most high-profile litigation matter is her representation of the plaintiff in Young v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 7:50 am
A cybersurveillance nonintrusion test implicitly suggested by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 7:50 am
A cybersurveillance nonintrusion test implicitly suggested by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 6:24 am
Jones, 369 N.C. 631 (2017). [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 5:24 am
Twenty years ago, the Supreme Court in Clinton v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:33 am
”The relevant case law for commandments 1 to 10 seems to be: Fylde Microsystems Ltd v Key Radio Systems Ltd [1998] FSR 449 Levy v Rutley (1871) (1871) LR 6 CP Tate v Thomas [1921] 1 Ch 503 Wiseman v George Weidenfeld & Nicolson Ltd [1985] FSR 525 Fylde Microsystems… [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:25 am
”The relevant case law for commandments 1 to 10 seems to be: Fylde Microsystems Ltd v Key Radio Systems Ltd [1998] FSR 449 Levy v Rutley (1871) (1871) LR 6 CP Tate v Thomas [1921] 1 Ch 503 Wiseman v George Weidenfeld & Nicolson Ltd [1985] FSR 525 Fylde Microsystems Ltd v Key Radio… [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 2:04 am
In concluding that Kogan had not sufficiently contributed to the screenplay [para 85], even by adding to the first three drafts, Hacon J considered the following points and authorities: Adding elements not themselves covered by copyright, such as scenic effects, is not a sufficient contribution (as per Tate v Thomas [1921] 1 Ch 503)Providing helpful criticism and expert feedback on the work is not a sufficient contribution (as per Wiseman v George Weidenfeld… [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 12:52 pm
That case (Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina et al. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 3:07 pm
That case (Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina et al. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 9:05 pm
Eric Claeys (George Mason/Scalia) on Penn Central v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 4:58 pm
Herzig, A Diachronic Approach to Bob Jones: Religious Tax Exemptions After Obergefell, 92 IND. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 7:42 am
Commonwealth's Brief at 5.Commonwealth v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:17 am
Securing the Homeland in the Post-Post 9/11 EraJohn Kelly, Secretary of Homeland Security Moderator: Pete Williams, Justice Correspondent, NBC News No Room for Error: Advising the President on Homeland Security and CounterterrorismThomas Bossert, Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism Moderator: David Sanger, Chief Washington Correspondent, The New York Times One Off or Turning Point: The Airstrike in SyriaJane Harman, President,… [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
The most important book ever written on presidential impeachment is only 69 pages long. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm
Nunziato, George Washington University Law School. [read post]
15 May 2017, 4:30 am
Hubbard (review) Tyler V. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am
Kline School of Law, Taming Pharma with Benefit CorporationsDmitry Karshtedt, The George Washington University Law School, Regulating ‘Evergreening’: The FDA's Role in the Creation of Balanced Rights for Pharmaceutical ImprovementsMichael Sinha, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Legal Approaches to Ensuring Timely Generic Drug AvailabilityRebecca Wolitz, Stanford Law School, Patents, Preemption, and Price-Gouging Teaching Session 1G – Room… [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am
And with respect to the President, in particular, it is what undergirds the Supreme Court’s decision in Clinton v. [read post]
