Search for: "Gibson v. J" Results 161 - 180 of 290
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2010, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
McLaughlin & ors v London Borough of Lambeth, heard 19-21 October 2010 (Tugendhat J). [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:30 am by INFORRM
On 26 October 2011 Tugendhat J handed down judgment in Morrissey v McNicholas ([2011] EWHC 2738 (QB)). [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:31 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Gibson DCJ decided to grant leave for the plaintiff to amend his statement of claim in Woolf v Brandt [2022] NSWDC 623. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Law Center) Jim Gibson (Univ. of Richmond School of Law) Eric Goldman (Santa Clara Univ. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
(Comments are closed as the article relates to ongoing legal proceedings, as Janine Gibson, editor in chief of Guardian US, explained on Twitter. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
  * European trade mark judges: it's time to join the Circle  CET-J is an independent group of 15 trade mark judges from Austria, Hungary, Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland, Turkey, France the United Kingdom, Portugal, Italy, Germany, and OHIM. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
On 22 March 2018 Warby J heard an application to commit in the case of George Galloway v Aisha Ali-Khan. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On 28 June 2018 there was a trial of a preliminary issue in the case of Morgan v Associated Newspapers before Nicklin J. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am by INFORRM
Two days later, Judge Gibson dismissed proceedings in Zimmerman v Perkiss (No.2) [2022] NSWDC 458. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 9 December 2020 Gibson DCJ handed down judgment in the case of Geyer v Ghosn [2020] NSWDC 744. [read post]
31 May 2020, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
On 21 May 2020 Steyn J handed down judgment in the case of CWD v Nevitt  [2020] EWHC 1289 (QB). [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  Discusses the decision in Gibson v IC and Craven District Council EA/2010/0095, where the Tribunal ordered disclosure of information insofar as it related to the use of public funds; the remainder could be withheld on the basis of FIO Act 2000, s 40. [read post]