Search for: "Givens v. Quinn" Results 161 - 180 of 311
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2013, 7:46 am by Lyle Denniston
Quinn (11-681): The issue is whether it is unconstitutional for a state to require home-care providers to pay fees to a union to represent their interests before state agencies. * Brandt Revocable Trust v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 9:26 am by Florian Mueller
On the one hand, it makes sense given that the ITC threw out five patents Google gave to HTC for the purpose of asserting them against Apple. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 6:12 pm by Richard Hunt
Given the precision of the standards, allowing anyone, whether expert or plaintiff, to testify based on observations unsupported by measurements is a dubious proposition. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 10:35 am by Florian Mueller
Samsung case.Samsung and its lawyers--Samsung's lead counsel before the Supreme Court was Quinn Emanuel Urqhart & Sullivan name partner Kathleen M. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 12:02 am
“There is no file on a shelf with everything there is on a given detainee,” O’Quinn said. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 11:45 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
Quinn’s methodology, as described above, created an arbitrary standard that could not have been within the contemplation of the bidders. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:00 pm by Graeme Hall
In the news: Prisoner voting remains in the headlines and given that the European Court of Human Rights has refused the UK government’s request to reconsider Greens and MT v UK, it’s not going to stray far. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The Reyelts Opinion In addition to Texas Insurance Code chapter 4102, the legal landscape forming the basis of the Keys' motion for class certification includes a federal court case, Reyelts v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The Reyelts Opinion In addition to Texas Insurance Code chapter 4102, the legal landscape forming the basis of the Keys' motion for class certification includes a federal court case, Reyelts v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 1:39 pm by Jeff Welty
City of Horn Lake, Miss., 449 F.3d 650 (5th Cir. 2006) (concluding that the plaintiff’s “undisputed failure to request a hearing defeats his liberty interest claim”); Quinn v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 11:26 pm by Florian Mueller
And while Apple hasn't sued anyone over a SEP yet (thus I haven't had the opportunity to remind them of their FRAND obligations), I lashed out at them when they described a $40 per-device damages claim over five software patents as a "reasonable royalty," given that "reasonable" is the "FR" part of "FRAND" (and the "ND" part wasn't put before the Apple v. [read post]