Search for: "Grant v. City of Houston*" Results 161 - 180 of 322
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2017, 6:49 am by John Elwood
A grant on either of these issues could make this term a big one for intellectual disability and capital punishment, since the court is already considering in Moore v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 8:48 am by Lyle Denniston
City officials had decided that they would provide equal benefits to city employees who were in a same-sex marriage as they did for employees in opposite-sex marriages. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 9:00 am by Don Cruse
Exhaustion of remedies required to enforce (old) settlement agreement CITY OF HOUSTON v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Attorney Gen. of the US, No. 07-2509 Petition for review of a BIA order finding petitioner removable for having committed an aggravated felony, contrary to an IJ's finding and grant of cancellation of removal, is granted where the BIA erred in failing to apply the modified categorical approach set forth in applicable Supreme Court precedent, and thus it erred when it considered petitioner's sentencing document to determine whether he had been convicted of an aggravated… [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 7:07 am
”   The city’s appeal (District of Columbia v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 5:57 am by Kiran Bhat
Palmer, who was part of the four-to-three majority ruling in favor of the city in the eminent domain case Kelo v. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 8:25 am
City of New York, 487 U.S. 1, 14, 108 S.Ct.2225, 101 L.Ed.2d 1 (1988). [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 4:17 am by David J. DePaolo
The Americans with Disability Act (ADA) can produce some strange results when matters are litigated, and a recent Texas case demonstrates that even if an employer thinks it is doing the right thing it still may be in violation of the law.In City of Houston v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 4:17 am by David J. DePaolo
The Americans with Disability Act (ADA) can produce some strange results when matters are litigated, and a recent Texas case demonstrates that even if an employer thinks it is doing the right thing it still may be in violation of the law.In City of Houston v. [read post]