Search for: "Grant v. City of Mobile"
Results 161 - 180
of 448
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2018, 12:30 am
Over to Richard:"Last Friday evening, as many of us were settling down to celebrate Christmas, from the City of Angels came tidings of a FRAND injunction.In the case of TCL v Ericsson, the Honourable James V. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 5:31 pm
App. 2017), review granted in part on Sept. 19, 2017. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 7:54 am
The highest-profile grant came in Janus v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
Scott v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 6:20 pm
Ling, et al. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 3:03 pm
Ling, et al. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
Even before the contract was signed, PRASA’s unionized workforce and the general public, even though unhappy with the level and quality of service that PRASA was providing, sought to mobilize opposition against any new private investment in PRASA, particularly from a foreign company with no substantial ties to Puerto Rico. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 9:42 am
Case citation: Mobile Mini v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 9:13 am
In Hensley v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 10:00 pm
Hunter v. [read post]
Precedential No. 5: TTAB Rejects Untimely, Fee-less Paper Opposition Filed Sans Petition to Director
3 Apr 2017, 3:16 am
DFC Expo LLC tried to oppose Brian Coyle's application to register the mark SODA CITY FIRE DEPT. for "Mobile beverage cart services featuring self-serve gourmet soda," but it turned out to be a false alarm. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 1:42 pm
In Starkman v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 11:56 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the border search case U.S. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 2:44 pm
” Alice Corp. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 2:44 pm
” Alice Corp. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:40 pm
In R. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 6:00 am
” AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:29 am
City of Los Angeles. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
(reversing habeas denial on ineffective assistance of counsel claim and granting relief from death sentence); and Zakrzewski v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
In reaction to the likely operation of marijuana delivery services within the city limits, the council adopted a new ordinance in 2013 that explicitly banned mobile dispensaries. [read post]
