Search for: "Grant v. Hobbs"
Results 161 - 180
of 334
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2015, 10:15 am
United States — proof needed to convict a public official for criminal extortion under the Hobbs Act DirecTV v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 10:55 am
As of now, the Court has granted certiorari (or, in one “original jurisdiction” case, Mississippi v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 5:24 pm
So the Ninth Circuit held last Friday in Jones v. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 8:53 pm
In Singh v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:25 am
” Other commentary focuses on the decision in EEOC v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 1:09 pm
But degree-granting institutions like GED granting institutions would get closer. [read post]
14 May 2015, 2:15 pm
United States 14-654Issue: Whether the conspiracy offense proscribed in the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
5 May 2015, 8:16 am
Davis, 754 F.3d 1205 (11th Cir.), reh’g en banc granted, opinion vacated, 573 F. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:56 am
In Sherbert v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am
The Court granted cert. in the four-time relist, adding an additional question that may explain the Court’s delay in granting cert. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am
” On to this week’s sole plenary grant, Hurst v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm
United States, 14-361, the peculiar case that asks whether a Hobbs Act conspiracy to commit extortion requires that the conspirators agree to obtain property from someone outside the conspiracy, or whether it’s enough to conspire with the people whose money they’re taking. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
In early February, the Court granted Bower a stay of execution, so something is going on here. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 7:50 am
Hobbs, decided on January 20. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
Hobbs, 574 U. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 7:24 am
Here, the Court granted cert to review Holt v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 3:11 pm
Micah Schwartzman, Richard Schragger, and Nelson TebbeIn Holt v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:17 pm
The case is of interest to employment lawyers in the public sector primarily because of the court’s analysis of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, a “sister statute” to the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and one which allows individuals “to seek religious accommodations pursuant to the same standard as set forth in RFRA,” in light of the similarities to employers seeking to apply a grooming and appearance policy to their employees (Holt… [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:37 pm
See, e.g., O’Lone v. [read post]
