Search for: "Grant v. Sullivan" Results 161 - 180 of 1,012
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Over at The Wall Street Journal, IJ Senior Attorney Michael Bindas explains why SCOTUS should grant cert in Carson v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 9:25 am by Kenan Farrell
Sullivan (SD, 1/18/2021) – On 3/10/21, the Defendant was granted another extension to file their Answer until 3/24/2021. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
The Wall argued that both cases should be granted along with the Baltimore case. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 10:50 am by Eugene Volokh
In practice, it's very unlikely that the Court would grant review in this case, and I don't see much appetite on the Court for overruling New York Times v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 7:48 am by Sarah Sutherland
Sullivan, 2020 ONCA 333 Housen v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:22 am by Tom Smith
The court made a second mistake by wrapping itself in legal knots (with Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan ignoring his own 2016 precedent, known as U.S. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 5:12 am by SHG
Can Judge Emmet Sullivan void this pardon? [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:33 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
If the worker moved to one of the California municipalities with a higher rate, like Los Angeles County ($15 per hour), it is possible that amount would be due under the California Supreme Court’s Sullivan v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm by Marty Lederman
  As Justice Barrett suggested, the alleged exemptions don't offer an "apples-to-apples" comparison, in contrast to her hypothetical in which a state grants exemptions for Sunday Sabbath observance but not Saturday Sabbath observance. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 3:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Moreover, the plaintiff failed to plead specific factual allegations showing that, had he not settled, he would have obtained a more favorable outcome” (Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 758; see Keness v Feldman, Kramer & Monaco, P.C., 105 AD3d at 813; Tortura v Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, P.C., 21 AD3d at 1083; Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 293; Rau v… [read post]