Search for: "Greene v. Gray"
Results 161 - 180
of 234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2009, 10:48 am
County of Fairfax, Va., 907 F.2d 1459, 1469 (4th Cir. 1990); compare Gray v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Gray On Claims) Precedential BPAI opinion rejects functional claim elements as indefinite and not enabled: Ex parte Rodriguez (Patently-O) BPAI issues opinions on four NTP patent re-examinations (12:01 Tuesday) ITC decides not to review ALJ's grant of Rambus' summary determination motion that its licensing activities satisfy the domestic industry requirement in certain semiconductor chips (337-TA-661) (ITC Law Blog) ITC issues final determination of no violation in matter… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Gray On Claims) Precedential BPAI opinion rejects functional claim elements as indefinite and not enabled: Ex parte Rodriguez (Patently-O) BPAI issues opinions on four NTP patent re-examinations (12:01 Tuesday) ITC decides not to review ALJ's grant of Rambus' summary determination motion that its licensing activities satisfy the domestic industry requirement in certain semiconductor chips (337-TA-661) (ITC Law Blog) ITC issues final determination of no violation in matter… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Gray On Claims) Precedential BPAI opinion rejects functional claim elements as indefinite and not enabled: Ex parte Rodriguez (Patently-O) BPAI issues opinions on four NTP patent re-examinations (12:01 Tuesday) ITC decides not to review ALJ’s grant of Rambus’ summary determination motion that its licensing activities satisfy the domestic industry requirement in certain semiconductor chips (337-TA-661) (ITC Law Blog) ITC issues final determination of no violation in… [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:25 pm
Distribution v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
(Gray on Claims) District Court N D California: Compliance with accused industry standard does not justify joinder of defendants in a single action: Finisar Corporation v. [read post]
12 Dec 2012, 10:49 am
You should see the long, awkward name for the macro highlighted in gray. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:19 am
Neelika Jayawardane, State University of New York-Oswego, “Clash of the Fong-Kong Civilisations: Containing Tricky Bodies in the Age of Mobility in Imraan Coovadia’s Green-eyed Thieves”Simone Glanert, Kent Law School, UK, “Europeanization of Law and Weltliteratur: A (Strong) Case for Indiscipline” Panel 3: Literature, Law, and Race, Rm. 603 Panel Chair: Jonathan Gray, John Jay College of Criminal JusticeChristopher M. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 11:08 am
Trademark Office issued the following 217 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in May 2024 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys: Registration Number Wordmark 7377089 M MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANA 7377091 MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANA 7377090 M MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANA 7383748 GUIDED PATHWAYS 7383753 GAME CHANGERS 7383747 PURPOSE FIRST 7383749 MOMENTUM PATHWAYS 7378370 KATHLEEN POST 7382555… [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
Beaudreaux, 17-1106); a habeas jurisdictional issue (Gray v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 10:34 am
Hyder v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 8:00 am
In County of Dallas v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:35 am
(IPBiz) US Patents – Decisions CAFC reverses DNH in Markem-Imaje Corporation v Zipher; Newman partially dissents (IPBiz) District Court Nevada: Plaintiff need not produce licenses involving unasserted patents where licenses involving patents-in-suit have been produced: Bally Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 2:12 pm
Dohrmann v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 2:12 pm
Dohrmann v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog) US Patents – Decisions Split Federal Circuit panel finds preamble language not limiting: Marrin v Griffin (GRAY on Claims) (Inventive Step) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct expert could not testify as to materiality absent qualification as a person skilled in the art: Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc v Sharp Corporation et al (Docket Report) District Court N D California: Intracompany patent transfer… [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:26 pm
The first category is most likely to be upheld by the Court, with the second more of a gray area, and the third less likely. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
The Texas landscape is devoid of shades of gray. [read post]
