Search for: "Gross v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 4,552
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2023, 4:45 pm
Like the Blake legislation, SB 5440 is derived from a court case, Trueblood v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Pending Bills California’s financial climate risk disclosure bill, known as the Climate-Related Financial Risk Act (SB 261), passed the State Senate on May 30 with a vote of 27-8 and is now before the state Assembly.[13] It would require covered businesses with annual gross revenues of more than $500 million to prepare and make public a “climate-related financial risk report disclosing the entity’s climate-related financial risk and measures adopted to… [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Employee claims he was terminated without cause In Maynard v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Employee claims he was terminated without cause In Maynard v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm
" (This, as it turns out, is among his least gross communications with her.) [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 3:27 am
As Ukraine treats embassies as being part of the “host state”, the marriage had to comply with Ukrainian law. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 10:32 am
Health Ass’n v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 10:32 am
Health Ass’n v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 10:32 am
Health Ass’n v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm
A change to venue law frees state attorneys-general from involuntary transfers of antitrust actions from their home states to distant forums handling multi-district litigation involving the same subject matter. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Under this theory, the Supreme Court held in American Electric Power v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 2:55 am
Although the Court of Appeal was clear, in Neurim v Generics [2020] EWCA Civ 793, that deciding to uphold the lower court’s decision not to grant a pharmaceutical patent PI was based on the specific facts of that case, the Patents Court has subsequently refused two further pharmaceutical PIs (Neurim v Teva [2022] EWHC 954 (Pat) and [2022] EWHC 1641(Pat), and Novartis v Teva [2022] EWHC 959 (Ch)). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:01 pm
One web-based media report stated, without qualification, that Agent Orange “increases bladder cancer risk. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:21 am
The Standard of Professional Behaviour in the 2008 and 2012 Police (Conduct) Regulations does not expressly state whether the criminal law test or the civil law test applies in police disciplinary proceedings in relation to the use of force. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 8:55 am
United States and the Original Meaning of Income on SSRN. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 3:46 pm
In Coster v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
See generally Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 6:53 am
VanDeWalker v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 2:14 pm
Today, the Court resolved the question in Counterman v. [read post]