Search for: "HADLEY v. HADLEY" Results 161 - 180 of 230
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2010, 3:17 am
 Under copyright law, "originality" does not have to be creative though, as the courts have affirmed -- though they sometimes get it wrong, as in Hadley v Kemp in 1999 (the 'Spandau Ballet' case). [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:14 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Elena Kagan and Alan Rozenshtein analyzed the five-hour Thompson v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Court, Minnesota 2014http://t.co/hJct1yNW5Q -> Identity of alleged defamatory statement ordered to disclosed Hadley v. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:38 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Kurup and Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s ruling in Patel v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 9:46 am by Tara Hofbauer
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Wells noted the opening of a week-long hearing in the military commission case, United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:01 pm
As the U.S. game opened, the German dominance evoked memories of the pithy law-school brief for the contracts chestnut Hadley v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:21 pm
  You could have gone on forever about Hadley v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 11:30 am
Nesgos, partner at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP...Tim Hughes, Chief Counsel at SpaceX, outlined the activity of Space X, an emerging launch services provider which has currently three launches contracted with NASA to ferry cargo and crew to the International Space Station under the Cots program....Finally, Sean Gates, Senior Partner at Gates and Partners, expanded on the legislative framework concerning space activities in the private sector. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 9:17 pm
The commission's on-premises guidelines are inapplicable to remote, Internet-based, sting operations, particularly when conducted by the Attorney General's office.I'm guessing that it's first-day training for FedEx's in-house counsel to reread Hadley v. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 8:22 pm
  The reasoning in Estate of Young was approved by the Court of Appeal in Hadley Estate (Re), 2017 BCCA 311, aff’g 2016 BCSC 765. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:34 pm by Giles Peaker
Tendering of a cheque can amount to (conditional) payment, if the cheque is honoured (Felix Hadley & Co v Hadley (1898) 2 Ch 681 ), and if so, counts as payment at the date the cheque is tendered (Homes v Smith (2000) Lloyds LR 139 ). [read post]