Search for: "HAMILTON MATERIALS INC." Results 161 - 180 of 280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
Posted by Laura Harder, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Wednesday, October 5, 2022 Editor's Note: Laura Harder is an Associate at Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 6:01 am
Mascari, Cornerstone Research, on Thursday, April 9, 2020 Tags: Accounting, Class actions, Merger litigation, Securities litigation, Settlements Annual General Meetings & COVID-19 Posted by Michael Laff, Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc., on Thursday, April 9, 2020 Tags: Boards of Directors, COVID-19, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder meetings, Virtual meetings Are Corporate Payouts Abnormally High in… [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 1:11 pm by Mike Aylward
  In keeping with the California Supreme Court’s ruling in Hamilton v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 2:21 pm by S2KM Limited
JGWPT Holdings, a class action lawsuit, accusing JGWPT Holdings, Inc., several affiliate companies including J.G. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:23 pm by Bexis
Hamilton, ___ S.W.3d ___, 2012 WL 2052783 (Tex. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:44 pm by WIMS
The BRC was co-chaired by: Lee Hamilton, former Democratic U.S. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 6:09 am
McDonald, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Monday, October 29, 2018 Tags: Boards of Directors, Charter & bylaws, Controlling shareholders, Delaware cases, Delaware law, DGCL Section 228, Dividends, Dual-class stock, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Securities litigation Commonsense Principles 2.0: A Blueprint for U.S. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On the issue of damages, Gibson commented simply that Collins and Vidal-Hall are conflicting authorities, and swiftly pointed out that Article 82(1) GDPR provides that Any person who has suffered material or non-material damage as a result of an infringement of this Regulation shall have the right to receive compensation from the controller or processor for the damage suffered. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 5:03 pm by Joy Waltemath
Although three years is a significant period of time, in this instance the employee offered evidence of other retaliatory behavior between a 2003 sexual harassment complaint and a 2006 reorganization and demotion that bridged the gap between the two events, leaving the issue of causation for a jury trial (Malin v Hospira, Inc, August 7, 2014, Hamilton, D). [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 5:52 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Wednesday, March 6, 2019 Tags: Arbitration, Board composition, Boards of Directors, Class actions, Disclosure, Diversity, Dual-class stock, Engagement, ESG, Institutional Investors, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder proposals SEC Enforcement for Internal Control Failures Posted by Nicolas Grabar, Sandra Flow and Alexander Janghorbani, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton… [read post]