Search for: "HARMS v. HARMS" Results 161 - 180 of 36,471
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2016, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
The Defendants argued that evidence of harm was required and that the evidence must show that serious harm had actually been caused by the date of the determination. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 6:06 pm
Woolf made new harms visible within a framework of proximity: in this way, we might think of Woolf’s work as theorizing a feminist aesthetic of justice, and as providing an alternate genealogy of responsibility to Donoghue v Stevenson.Download the article from SSRN at the link. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 1:08 pm by INFORRM
This case emphasises the lesson from Amersi v Leslie [2023] EWHC 1368 (KB) that when approaching the issue of serious harm the tort rules of causation are still in play and should not be overlooked. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 3:09 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
  Although Florida courts apply the presumption of irreparable harm, the presumption can be rebutted if the entrepreneur can establish “absence of an injury,” as demonstrated in TransUnion Risk & Alternative Data Sols., Inc. v. [read post]