Search for: "HUNTER v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 161 - 180
of 325
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In a 1950 California case, State Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 9:00 am
· Reva Siegel, Yale Law School (moderator)· Katherine Franke, Columbia Law School· Nan Hunter, Georgetown Law Center/Williams Institute· Kristin Luker, University of California, Berkeley· Dean Spade, Seattle… [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 7:00 pm
· Reva Siegel, Yale Law School (moderator)· Katherine Franke, Columbia Law School· Nan Hunter, Georgetown Law Center/Williams Institute· Kristin Luker, University of California, Berkeley· Dean Spade, Seattle… [read post]
13 Dec 2012, 6:06 pm
Perhaps someone read the Disney v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 4:51 am
Supreme Court’s decisions in Washington v Seattle Sch Dist No 1 (1982) and Hunter v Erickson (1969), the appeals court found that Proposal 2 unconstitutionally altered Michigan’s political structure by impermissibly burdening racial minorities. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 12:58 pm
p=2278 Netflix Gets an Earful and Settles Suit with Deaf ViewersLawyers.com: http://blogs.lawyers.com/2012/10/netflix-gets-an-earful-and-settles-suit-with-deaf-viewers/Ruling on Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings: http://dredf.org/captioning/MJP-DENIED-JUDGE-PONSOR-ORDER-6-19-12.pdf ‘Dog’ Chapman Scores Big Legal Victory Against ‘Bounty Hunter’ Producer THResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/dog-chapman-scores-big-legal-387379 National Conference of… [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:38 am
Supreme Court decisions that form the basis of the “political structure doctrine”: Hunter v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 3:20 pm
Hunter next discussed the Board’s recent invitation for input on whether university faculty members are employees covered under the NLRA or are managerial employees excluded from coverage, as was established by the case NLRB v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 9:03 pm
Tice, the famous “which hunter shot him? [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 10:00 am
The open letter below, from Ralph Nader, was read at the American Association of Justice annual convention in July. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 1:41 pm
In Westwood Apex v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:41 pm
Olsen Earlier this week, the California Court of Appeals issued a ruling in Iskanian v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:41 pm
Olsen Earlier this week, the California Court of Appeals issued a ruling in Iskanian v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:19 pm
Olsen Earlier this week, the California Court of Appeals issued a ruling in Iskanian v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:41 pm
Olsen Earlier this week, the California Court of Appeals issued a ruling in Iskanian v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:19 pm
Olsen Earlier this week, the California Court of Appeals issued a ruling in Iskanian v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:17 am
§ 1782 from Whom Discovery May Be Compelled for Use in a Foreign or International Proceeding – bit.ly/INQhaD (Gregory Joseph) Four Lessons Counsel Can Learn About Da Silva Moore and Predictive Coding | Quarles & Brady - bit.ly/IDjI9s (Steven Hunter) Globalisation - bit.ly/IY3UkD (Charles Holloway) How to Establish a Defensible Deletion Policy – http://bit.ly/IPat8u (Jim McGann) Inside Straight: Why Are Elections Like eDiscovery? [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
Sure, there have been other cases involving joint tortfeasors where it was hard to discern the specific culprit, such as a pair of quail hunters negligently discharging their shotguns toward a fellow hunter (Summers v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 7:57 am
Doe, 272 F. 3d 116, 122– 123 (CA2 2001); Hunter, 62 F. 3d, at 274; United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 10:07 am
See: Peter Dale Scott & Jonathan Marshall, Cocaine Politics: Drugs, Armies, and the CIA in Central America, University of California Press, Berkley and Los Angeles, California, 1998. pp. 76-77. [read post]
