Search for: "HURST v. HURST" Results 161 - 180 of 476
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2016, 2:10 pm by Joe Mullin
During hours of unrelenting cross-examination today, Andy Rubin, Google’s former Android chief, was on the stand in the Oracle v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 5:44 am by Amy Howe
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger criticizes a recent story in The Washington Post on the Court’s recent decision in Hurst v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:11 am by Amy Howe
In The Washington Post, Mark Berman reports on the aftermath of the Court’s recent decision in Hurst v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
Earlier this year, the News Roundup noted that the United States Supreme Court held in Hurst v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
Earlier this year, the News Roundup noted that the United States Supreme Court held in Hurst v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
DeGirolami, On Expressivism and Retributivism in 'The Mighty and the Almighty', (Journal of Analytic Theology (Forthcoming)).Caroline Mala Corbin, The Contraception Mandate Accommodated: Why the RFRA Claim in Zubik v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 12:45 am by INFORRM
In Galloway v William Frederick Frazer, Google Inc t/a YouTube and others, Mr Justice Horner in the High Court of Northern Ireland refused an application by Google Inc. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:25 pm by Jeff Redding
(Nussbaum, p. 76) The constitutionality of this evasive set of maneuvers went all the way up to the Supreme Court, and in Briscoe v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:06 pm by CJLF Staff
Supreme Court's decision in Hurst v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 9:25 am by Miracle Jones
The stay [case docket] comes after the US Supreme Court [official website] determined in Hurst v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 7:38 am by Andrew Hamm
Louisiana, holding that Miller v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm by John Elwood
Florida, 15-6430, both brought constitutional challenges to Florida’s death penalty statute which – until the Court declared it unconstitutional two weeks ago in Hurst v. [read post]