Search for: "Hand v. Butts"
Results 161 - 180
of 248
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2012, 5:12 am
He thus decided that it would simply be too damaging to the Court's credibility if there were a straight Republican/Democratic split on the Court, when confronted with the most politically salient case since Bush v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:50 am
The respondent in the English proceedings, on the other hand, Rosneft, is a Russian state-controlled company. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:04 pm
But on the other hand, if the plaintiffs can demonstrate that they’ve got a seriously kick-butt case, why should the defendants be permitted to continue to engage in their alleged misconduct? [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:01 am
See, e.g, United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:20 pm
Our butts hurt in sympathy for Mr. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:21 am
Interestingly, Wells Fargo v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 6:46 pm
Supreme Court to hand down its decision in the first of the ‘show me your stinkin’ papers’ SB 1070 illegal immigration case: Arizona v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 3:32 am
Three weeks ago in State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:52 pm
Just as Miller v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:38 am
Vernor v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:30 am
Stebley v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 8:08 am
Smith v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 9:15 am
Compare other more or less imitative verbs with final -ump , e.g. bump v.1, dump v.1, stump v.1, thump v., etc. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 7:27 am
Therefore, inconsistency in claimed defenses or even between a defendant's testimony and a defense ‘should not deprive defendant of the requested charge’ if the charge would otherwise be warranted by the evidence” (People v Butts, 72 NY2d 746, 750 [1988] [internal citations omitted]). [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 4:23 am
That hit a brick wall in a major new decision in Muhummad v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 2:39 am
Sullivan & Cromwell took on Cory Maples' appeal as a gesture of noblesse oblige, and handed it to their younguns for practice. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:34 am
On the other hand, he basically seemed, at least from my perspective, to think that if the court were simply to reaffirm what it did in FCC v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm
Her response prompted the defence lawyer to reply, “Oh, like an earplug but for your butt”. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 7:34 pm
Greg Miller: my tax and financial wish list contains two items. first congress needs to pass the Fair Tax act of 2011 H.R. 25/S.13. passing the fairtax will take us closer to our founding fathers goals of a voluntary, progressive tax on purchases above the federal poverty guidelines. it removes embedded tax costs of goods produced here in the united states making our U.S. made goods more competitive with imported goods. it allows international companies to invest profits from overseas operations… [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 1:05 pm
(Wells, at p. 1195; Butt v. [read post]
