Search for: "Handy v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 523
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm
Whether the Courts will agree may be another matter, which may get addressed in judicial review of this decision and perhaps much sooner in the AC v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 6:37 am
Which is why it’s useful to have a few appellate decisions handy stating the obvious: when it comes to temporary injunctions, trust litigation is not the twilight zone — the same rules apply. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:45 pm
Kelly v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 9:12 am
How to Use: In United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 10:26 am
It’s a handy thing for a shopping list or to compile things to tell your lawyer to do. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 12:01 pm
King v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 3:08 pm
” United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
For example, a student in Tinker v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:51 am
The correct answer is “Supreme Court decision in Young v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 1:52 pm
Last week I delivered an oral argument to the court in connection with our appeal in Hangartner v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 9:11 am
As a directive, it could only set the minimum legal standards the EU member states had to meet in their own data protection laws; the member states otherwise could craft their own laws as they saw fit. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 9:50 am
But as the year winds down, here’s a handy list of the most significant ones (with links to our earlier entries). [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 4:36 am
The case of Luis v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:39 am
Fortunately the IPKat has been able to count on this handy analysis by Laura Thompson (Lexis PSL IP & IT team). [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 11:41 am
With all of the court cases, including Loving v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 6:09 am
If you are considering a Rule 54(b) appeal, a good case at bar is Bell Microproducts, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 2:51 am
Although the regulations governing use of a Community collective mark must authorise any person whose goods or services do originate in the geographical area as a member of the proprietor association, it does not prevent that association from stating in those regulations that undertakings which collaborate with bodies whose goods originate from the geographical area or use the goods of the association as their raw materials, without being established in, or having their goods originate… [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:19 am
(If you’re not sure whether you need to file, check out this handy post.) [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 10:43 am
” United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 12:04 pm
(See here for a handy map.) [read post]
