Search for: "Hanover v. Hanover" Results 161 - 180 of 515
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2018, 2:47 pm by Gene Killian
The fraud coverage issue also recently came up in a federal case in California, Hanover v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 2:47 pm by Gene Killian
The fraud coverage issue also recently came up in a federal case in California, Hanover v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:45 pm by Bevin Newman and Thomas Dillickrath
The direct purchaser rule, established through the Supreme Court’s decisions in Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 9:46 am
The selection committee does not fall under the statute because it is not a committee of the town of Hanover but a committee of the superintendent. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:51 am by Paul A. Prados
As the case was filed before commencement of the special session it should have been dismissed if filed in Federal Court just like Carter v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Under the circumstances of this case, the defendants failed to establish, as a matter of law, that the plaintiff would not have been able to prove that the premises owner did not, by its own snow and ice removal efforts, create or exacerbate the allegedly dangerous condition which caused the plaintiff's injuries (see Sut v City Cinemas Corp., 71 AD3d 759; Gil v Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 39 AD3d 703; see also Robles v City of New York, 56 AD3d 647;… [read post]