Search for: "Harms v. Reed" Results 161 - 180 of 490
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, John Reed Stark, President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, sorts out the issues involved in the battle between Apple and the government, in light of all the circumstances, including the February 29, 2016 opinion by Eastern District of New York Judge James Orenstein in the separate Apple iPhone unlocking case. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:27 am by Adam Wagner
Judgments were also published in non-anyonmised form – see Doncaster v Haigh and Doncaster v Watson. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 6:00 am by Tim Sitzmann
The Ninth Circuit reversed this long-standing case law in Herb Reed Enterprises, LLC v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 9:16 am
It's limited to indicating origin, rather than distinguishing, and as a result seems to seek confusion, rather than harm to distinguishing power as in Arsenal v Reed CA]*It was ultimately for the referring court to determine if the functions of a trade mark had been jeopardized, though the ECJ noted that Adam Opel had not alleged an effect on any of the other trade mark functions. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 4:41 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In relation to the tort gateway issue, Lord Lloyd-Jones (with whom Lord Reed, Lord Briggs, and Lord Burrows agree) gave the lead judgment. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post from John Reed Stark, President, John Reed Stark Consulting LLC, and David R. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark is President of John Reed Stark Consulting LLC, a data breach response and digital compliance firm. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 2:49 pm
[IPKat comment - more explicit acknowledgment than in Arsenal v Reed ECJ that a trade mark has functions other than the origin function] [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 3:37 am by Robin Shea
Judge Reed O’Connor’s ruling in favor of the plaintiffs was temporary, not final. [read post]