Search for: "Harris v. Department of State" Results 161 - 180 of 1,363
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2013, 11:03 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In the 14-page unanimous per curiam ruling this week by a three-member panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Judicial Watch, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 5:23 am by Susan Brenner
He and Lopez talked, and Harris reported his findings to Paul Hart, a foreman. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:42 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Although Harris had discussed one section of the brief at length in his letter, he unambiguously stated that he wished to press "all" of the issues he had presented to the Fourth Department, including his affirmative defense claim. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 7:22 am
Skip to next paragraph Harry Campbell Related "Executioner Identities: Toward Recognizing a Right to Know Who Is Hiding Beneath the Hood" by Ellyde Roko (Fordham Law Review, April 2007) California First Amendment Coalition v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 9:00 am by Marc Randazza
Recently, we had a pretty spooky case come down, Schmidt v. [read post]
The power of stingrays, and the lengths to which police will go to conceal their use, are demonstrated by an ongoing case in Florida, State v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 9:09 am by Kenneth Anderson
Circuit has handed down its opinion in Al Maqaleh v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Out-of-state employers, insurers, employee benefit plan vendors, and other businesses registered to do business in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, or another state that requires that out-of-state businesses consent to jurisdiction as a condition of their registration to do business in the state face a heightened risk of getting hauled into court in the consent to jurisdiction state following last month’s Supreme Court decision in… [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:53 am
DeShaney, indeed, keeps company with the also-controversial Harris v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 3:02 am
DeShaney, indeed, keeps company with the also-controversial Harris v. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
As the unanimous Court said in the 1974 Watergate Case, United States v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
At Letters Blogatory, Ted Folkman looks at the decision, noting that the opinion puts the state and federal courts in the United States “on the same page with the Special Commission of the Hague Conference, the US State Department, most if not all foreign courts, and more or less all writers on the subject. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 6:07 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
Indeed, the Department of Justice gets outright indignant at the suggestion, and so do many state court prosecutors. [read post]