Search for: "Hatch v Hatch" Results 161 - 180 of 1,284
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2020, 1:15 pm by Sanjeev Mahanta, Ph.D., J.D.
Section 156 of the Hatch-Waxman Act provides for restoring some of a patent’s term consumed during clinical testing and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) review of a New Drug Application (NDA) for a product covered by the patent. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 8:15 pm by Patent Docs
-- Examining the Top 3 Pre-Suit Due Diligence Issues Counsel on Both Sides Should Be Evaluating In Anticipation of a Paragraph IV Suit • The Expansion of the Hatch Waxman Safe Harbor -- Addressing HOW Recent Developments in the Evolution of Case Law Are Impacting Litigation Approaches to Paragraph IV Disputes • PTO v.... [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 9:55 pm by Patent Docs
ACI faculty will provide insights into: • PTO Procedures utilization in a Hatch-Waxman scenario: IPR, reissue, and more; • Teva v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
By Andrew Williams -- Late last year, in AstraZeneca v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 8:58 pm by Patent Docs
The conference will allow attendees to: • Devise strategies relative to the use of new PTO proceedings such as IPR in Hatch-Waxman litigation; • Understand how new 271(e)(1) controversies under Claussen and Momenta may undo Roche v. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 8:50 pm by Patent Docs
Roxane is a game changer in Hatch-Waxman litigation; whether the lesser role of secondary considerations will relegate Acorda to the sidelines in high tech... [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- In a move that will surprise almost no one (except perhaps members of the Supreme Court majority in FTC v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:51 pm by Patent Docs
While the Commission has been issuing these Reports since the MMA was enacted, this year's report is significant, because it is the first Report issued by the FTC after the Supreme Court's decision in FTC v. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 1:42 pm
The House bill only sought to curtail the effect of this provision (entered by Congress in 1984) by applying it to tangible items (as opposed to software inventions per the 2005 Federal Circuit appeal of Eolas Techs. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 1:59 pm by James M. Beard
  Few details of the accident are currently available; however, early reports indicate the crewman suffered serious injuries to his arm when a hatch was closed upon him. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 8:42 pm by Patent Docs
August 20, 2013 - Licensing Self-Replicating Technologies after Monsanto (Intellectual Property Owners Association) - 2:00 to 3:00 pm (ET) August 21, 2013 - Inducement to Infringe in Hatch-Waxman Litigation: Lessons from Commil USA v. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 9:29 pm by Patent Docs
Cisco Systems and Bayer Schering v. [read post]