Search for: "Health & Welfare v. Doe" Results 161 - 180 of 1,422
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2016, 11:37 am by Greg Mersol
-The fact that health coverage is only available to those receiving pensions does not “tie” the two together and does not support a claim that the welfare benefits might vest. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:42 am by Lyle Denniston
The controlling opinion of the three in Thomas More Law Center, et al., v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 12:36 am by INFORRM
   the effect of the wrong on the plaintiff’s health, welfare, social, business or financial position; 3. [read post]
24 May 2017, 10:00 pm
On May 19, 2017, the Alabama Supreme Court released its opinion in SSC Selma Operating Company, LLC, d/b/a Warren Manor Health & Rehabilitation Center and SavaSeniorCare Administrative Services, LLC v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 8:48 am
Those conditions, taken from the language of the bill: (i) An interconnection, as defined in section 269-141, is maintained with an electric public utility to preserve the lessees’ or tenants’ ability to be served by an electric utility; (ii) Such person does not use an electric public utility’s transmission or distribution lines to provide, sell, or transmit electricity to lessees or tenants; (iii) At the time that the lease agreement is signed, the rate charged to the… [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 12:42 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
In the interest of public health, safety, and welfare, most construction projects require the services of licensed contractors. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 2:05 pm
  Does the state of the science enable the EPA to make a rational judgment now, in either direction, about the health and welfare effects of a given pollutant? [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 11:46 am by Bexis
This just in:  In Ironworkers Local 68 & Participating Employers Health & Welfare Funds v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 9:11 am by Russell Jackson
Continuing that long line of cases rejecting claims by third party payors seeking to recover sums paid for medicines that allegedly were promoted for off-label uses is Southeast Laborers Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:45 am by John Elwood
Geithner, 11-438, for the other health care cases granted on Monday. [read post]